Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There he stood, the godhead of a populist revenge movement, tucked into his satiny cummerbund...

The NYT sure does hate "populists," who believe in government of, by and for the people.

The opposite of populism is elitism, the belief that the governed are not qualified to choose political leaders from among their ranks and that the only legitimate political leaders come from an entitled, hereditary, criminal political class.

1 posted on 10/18/2024 12:11:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

https://youtu.be/pX8ov3B9wc4

Lifetime Democrat suburban females are voting Trump.


2 posted on 10/18/2024 12:13:32 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NYT sounds very butthurt.


3 posted on 10/18/2024 12:13:35 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We must save “Our Democracy” by rejecting populism! We must adhere to the beliefs of the Elites and cast aside the wishes of the governed! Only by doing exactly as we are told can we escape the horrors of a totalitarian regime.


4 posted on 10/18/2024 12:15:30 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (My decisions about people are based almost entirely on skin color. I learned this from Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The whole thing is available at the Conservative Tree House. He didn’t pull any punches. Schumers face, right next to the podium looked like the knocker on Scrooge’s door. Melania sat next to Trump , about three seats to his left as he spoke.


5 posted on 10/18/2024 12:17:35 PM PDT by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It got awkward because his opponent, Harris, was not there so Trump stood there by himself.


6 posted on 10/18/2024 12:18:07 PM PDT by paudio (Liberals teach Whites about guilt and shame much better than Christian churches do...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

😂😂😂😂. Boy howdee! Again, the nyt is all TDS all the time these days. Like I said, 11/6/2024 nyt announcement of Trump’s win will be page 3, #10 font, single column. Hey time nyt-———🖕


7 posted on 10/18/2024 12:18:58 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within ? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There he stood, standing there, not sitting down, but on his feet, in a verticle position. Did we mention standing? The horror of it all.


8 posted on 10/18/2024 12:18:59 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Awkward for whom? He was killing it.


10 posted on 10/18/2024 12:22:57 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Clay Bevis and Cuck Butthead are panty wadded, pearl clutching cowards. Rush deserves better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The elites have to give way to we the people. Trump is the face of it but he’s not the only one

It was very awkward in there. They were staring holes into Trump. RFK Jr was squirming

Schumer and Bloomberg were posing for gargoyle sculptors

Jim gaffigan was like Johnny Carson on a random Tuesday night ‘he well that one don’t work either’

Trump was awkward. Not so much that he’ll dream of giving up this fight, but enough that most men of inferior character and courage sure would have

The NYT should really get a grip on that fact

Trump is coming back. With backing and in full realization of whom he is up against in the renaissance of this country and the west

Onward


14 posted on 10/18/2024 12:25:30 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The money quotes of the article...

‘At least half the dais looked profoundly depressed when he said, “I’m going to win.”
But there is nothing they — in all their money and their power and their media mastery — can do about it.’

The NYT seems to be already inching toward the “acceptance” stage of grief.


16 posted on 10/18/2024 12:27:18 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

More gobbilty gook “journalism”.


18 posted on 10/18/2024 12:32:17 PM PDT by Huskrrrr (Alinsky, you magnificent Bastard, I read your book!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I watched the whole thing. Trump was hilarious, very much at ease, and got a standing ovation.

The only thing “awkward” was Harris’ cringe video she mailed in and which totally flopped.

Spin spin spin NYT. No one believes your lies any more. It’s too easy to check you and see you are full of BS.


19 posted on 10/18/2024 12:35:29 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Orange is the new brown in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The opposite of populism is elitism, ...”

Many, (most?), on the left not so secretly desire a monarchy. They want to worship their leader, idolize that person, and be free from having to make decisions because the monarch will do that for them.


21 posted on 10/18/2024 12:37:35 PM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

populist revenge movement?

really?

how exactly do you take revenge for 60m+ dead American kids?


22 posted on 10/18/2024 12:38:13 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump was brilliant at the dinner and was delivering jokes so effectively that they kept sneaking up on you, I’ve never seen him this humorous before, it was professional level.

Here is his entire portion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XI0MUoW28VE


24 posted on 10/18/2024 12:40:20 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Funny.
Her New York Times DID NOT seem to feel it was awkward when their Chosen One “chose” not to even show up for a “unrehearsed” personal speech to a live audience.

Instead, “she” ran a scripted comedy video.


28 posted on 10/18/2024 12:48:53 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The really ironic thing about Trump versus NY elite is -- He used to be one of them!

He was even golfing buddies with Bill Clinton.

That is why their hate is so infused with hysteria.

29 posted on 10/18/2024 12:51:10 PM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Does the NYT ever read the crap they publish??


30 posted on 10/18/2024 12:59:29 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Blumberg sure looked happy! /sarc


32 posted on 10/18/2024 1:02:51 PM PDT by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Contentiousness at the Al Smith Dinner is nothing new. Here’s a blurb from wikipedia:

Since 1980, this custom has been affected by friction between the Democratic Party and the Catholic Church over abortion. During the 1980 dinner, Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter was booed. In 1984, Ronald Reagan spoke, but his opponent, Walter Mondale, opted out, saying he needed time to prepare for an upcoming presidential debate. Amy Sullivan suggests that Mondale’s decision was motivated by “tensions between the Catholic Church and the Democratic Party.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_E._Smith_Memorial_Foundation_Dinner


33 posted on 10/18/2024 1:04:05 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson