[E. Pluribus Unum]

...The rant, described by seven people with knowledge of the meal who spoke on the condition of anonymity...

NYT "Russia Collusion" fabrication deja vu all over again.

[BRL]

NYT, the predictable choice for spin and misdirection.

[Ann Archy]

WHO WOULD BELIEVE THESE KNOWN LIARS?

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

--- "who spoke on the condition of anonymity"

[Larry Lucido]

Over steak and baked potatoes, the former president tore through a bitter list of grievances.

Maybe it was Festivus.

[vivenne]

Sounds like a handful of people attended so 7 is pretty much everyone there. Would they all talk to the press knowing the odds are small that it is not one of them who spoke and betrayed Trump?

[JudyinCanada]

Sounds like his first little chat with NATO.

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

This has all the earmarks of NYT disinformation.

[sauropod]

And Maggie and Jonathan Swan know all this exactly how?

[italianquaker]

Ny times reports without evidence

[JusPasenThru]

Bullshit.

[Gaffer]

This, from NYT, is not to be believed. Name the names or show some videos. Otherwise, it didn’t happen.

[Williams]

Why would it be bad that he didn’t “ingratiate” himself with billionaires?

And they say he DIDN’T help them with their taxes!

Plus he says all this stuff in public every day.

I missed the negatives.

[twister881]

Also from the NYT:
• Communism is good.
• Stalin didn’t cause famines.
• There was no Holocaust under Hitler.
• Russia, Russia, Russia was real.
• Hunter’s laptop wasn’t.

[grimalkin]

I love these NYT headlines. Something to laugh at. What a rag.

[workerbee]

Whew - thankfully they weren’t driving cuz he probably would’ve lunged for the wheel. Lunged, I tell you!

[Toespi]

So what? This is what real leaders do.

[Da Coyote]

Never bother reading. Juvenile writing, laughable logic, and nonexistent morals. Typical journalists.

[Sirius Lee]

It's the NYT's so this could be true.

Just like these totally true and accurate, not debunked, pictures of people riding Weiner dogs:

[stanne]

Many at FR read these headlines and after a couple maybe 10, 20, even nearly 25 years of it, know straight off how to re name the source publication in order to interpret content for whatever reason, economy of time, knowing the enemy, whatever it is there is no fear in seeing what leftists are saying

Personally, I took my enlightenment of the NYT as an anti conservative at levels of ignorance, subversion, collusion and lies, the most destructive apologized-for on the bottom of page A 16, the netherworld reserved for defense attorneys

I confess to enjoying the word puzzles, in the words of a family friend hailing from her spot in the tony NY suburb of Greenwich, this BLEEP rag, the clues of which even earning that nickname

I see the NYT byline here and I call it the BS Times and read on or skip over accordingly, but I never view it as the paper of record that was flung on our doorstep growing up in our own tiny NY suburban spot

My parents managed to be quietly conservative and wise in most ways despite the BS Times.

It’s a lesson in being impermeable to brainwashing

[enumerated]

Yeah sure, NYT…