Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Frustrated Trump Lashes Out Behind Closed Doors Over Money
The New York Times ^ | Oct. 12, 2024, 5:04 a.m. ET | Jonathan Swan, Maggie Haberman and Shane Goldmacher

Posted on 10/12/2024 11:00:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

41 posted on 10/12/2024 1:47:05 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They.must be paying the AI attack machine overtime money.


42 posted on 10/12/2024 1:53:53 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Clay Bevis and Cuck Butthead are panty wadded, pearl clutching cowards. Rush deserves better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So nobody will go on record with their name or recording of the moment.


43 posted on 10/12/2024 1:58:48 PM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If the New York Times says it - I believe it! also the good fairy, the Easter Bunny, Bigfoot, Aliens and anything Kamala says!


44 posted on 10/12/2024 2:04:24 PM PDT by 2nd Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

<>people with knowledge of the meal who spoke on the condition of anonymity<>

The Left’s go-to source.

IOW, the entire article could be, as others have been, pure fiction designed to slime PDJT.


45 posted on 10/12/2024 2:05:31 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“described by seven people with knowledge of the meal”

uh, huh ... VERY careful way to phrase said “knowledge” ... did these ANONYMOUS sources have first hand, second hand, or third hand or even fourth hand “knowledge”?


46 posted on 10/12/2024 2:08:02 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

True or not, fake news or real, from my personal perspective from what Trump fund raising has hit my Email inbox for months, is that Trump should fire everyone leading any and all of his fundraising efforts.

The approach, to me directly in Emails has been amateurish and at times downright childish. I can only blame Trump, not knowing his personal involvement in those efforts, but knowing he should have been copied on everyone of them, to know what exactly was being presented in his name.


47 posted on 10/12/2024 2:14:06 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Donations go thru WINRED, because it is an efficient way for the RNC and the candidate, to properly record the transaction.

By USPS mail (see PDF form instructions that follow, herein), you can designate how a donation is to be allocated. There is no reliable selector switch for that, when donating via online digital means.

The form to use, that must accompany a check:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/djtweb24/general/TNC_Contributor_Form.pdf

The addressee on that form, now shows for 2024, but the address is the same as it was in 2020:

Trump National Committee JFC, Inc.
P.O. Box 509
Arlington, VA 22216

The form (the PDF file) states:

Contributions to TNC [Trump National Committee JFC, Inc.] are subject to federal contribution limits and source prohibitions. Contributions from corporations, foreign nationals (i.e., without “green cards”), federal government contractors, and other federally impermissible sources are prohibited.

Contributions made in the name of, or refunded by, any other person are prohibited by law.

Contributions to TNC from individuals (multicandidate PACs) will be allocated according to the following formula:

1. 90% to DJTFP [Donald J. Trump for President], which will designate the funds first to its primary election account, then to its general election account, and finally to its recount account, up to a maximum of $3,300 ($5,000) per election; and

2. 10% to the RNC, up to a maximum of $413,000 ($150,000) per year.

Any contribution exceeding the legal amount that may be contributed to any committee will be distributed to the remaining participating committee to the extent permitted by federal law and according to the allocation method set forth above.

Any contribution that would cause a contributor to exceed any applicable federal contribution limit or otherwise not be permissible under FECA and FEC regulations will be refunded to the contributor.

Contributors may specify a different allocation than the one set forth above.

Assuming that statement is reliable, a donor should be able to write BOLDLY on the form (and as a memo on the check):

"My total contribution is ONLY for the Donald J. Trump for President 2024 campaign."

- - -

48 posted on 10/12/2024 2:31:25 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; linMcHlp

CORRECTION - delete following line:

“The addressee on that form, now shows for 2024, but the address is the same as it was in 2020:”

NOW (10/12/2024) the address on the downloaded PDF file, the form, is now slightly different than in 2020.


49 posted on 10/12/2024 2:34:34 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Liked your #22.


50 posted on 10/12/2024 2:43:33 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (TrumpII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Author writing now about 2 week old happenings?


51 posted on 10/12/2024 4:56:41 PM PDT by b4me (Pray, and let God change you. He knows better than you or anyone else, who He made you to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4me
Author writing now about 2 week old happenings?

Shows you how desperate they are.

52 posted on 10/12/2024 5:06:08 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

ANYTHING with crapslut Habermann’s name on it is at risk of being outed as “made up out of whole cloth”. She is an agenda driven bitch who will lie her ass off whenever required.


53 posted on 10/12/2024 5:57:17 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Corrected:
..The rant, described by seven people with knowledge of the meal listening in from Langley, Virginia, who spoke on the condition of anonymity...

54 posted on 10/12/2024 6:31:49 PM PDT by nicollo (Remember when we had to close tags?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson