[SubMareener]

https://heim-theory.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Illobrand_von_Ludwiger-The_New_Worldview_of_the_Physicist_Burkhard_Heim.pdf

Burkhard Heim: Been there, done that.

[BenLurkin]

The obtained equation is covariant in space-time and invariant with respect to any Planck scale.

[Leaning Right]

I have more than a passing interest in physics. But the author never bothers to say who the researchers are, or where they work. They are just “the researchers”. I find that quite odd. Is the author just sloppy?

There are links in the article. The links lead to very technical stuff that I can follow, but will require more coffee.

[dfwgator]

[BEJ]

Yes, you have the quantum for the micro world, and you have relativity for our world. But what about for the macro world? The macro world would be the way things work on the very large scale. An analogy would be, if we existed in the micro level with the quantum world, what would be the world of relativity? It would be one size larger than our world.

Some might say there are no laws pertaining to a macro world. How can we know for sure?

[Fungi]

Worried about physics when a fungus is about to destroy the world’s banana crop? Get real.

[AdmSmith]

“The masses of electrons, muons, and tau can be explained by the different curvatures of universe, galaxy, and solar system, respectively.”

I say as Richard Feynman would have said: BS!

[broken_clock]

[Nateman]

In Medieval times the Holy Grail of understanding everything was the Philosophers Stone. Issac Newton himself pursued Alchemy in trying to find it. I mention this because the modern equivalent is the Unified Grand Theory of Everything. The attempt to create some theory that united Quantum Mechanics with Einstein's General Relativity is a pursuit over a century old now. If this paper succeeds a Nobel Prize in Physics will be well earned. ( Even though the Nobel Peace Prize is worth about as much as a Cracker Jack prize)

[faithhopecharity]

there are a couple quite plausible theoretical connections between quantum field theory and Einstein’s theory of general relativity. the maths apparently work out pretty well. we await some verification, experimental validation...

(which will then certainly result in Nobel prizes, this is somewhat analogous to how Bell’s Theorum questioning local causality and thus Einstein’s firm gut feelings about the matter ... did not result in any Nobel prizes until there was experimental evidence for it years later)

[CharlesOConnell]

So now, what use will mad scientists employed by Bill Gates, Klaus Schwabb, George Soros & Noel Yuval Harari make of this, to afflict billions of ordinary people who just want to mind their own business & be left alone?

[SuperLuminal]

Kamala H. is a co-author of this delirium...

[fella]

Gravity is the next big field in physics.

[Getready]

Supposedly, we cannot theoretically measure or conceive of anything smaller than the Planck scale”. That doesn’t mean that a smaller than Plancks scale doesn’t exist. If a smaller scale exists, the physicists may have to reformulate the whole set of equations. Which raises a question...will we ever understand the universe on our own terms?
Is knowledge asymptotic? Ever learning but never coming to the truth?

Any significance that one of the authors of the paper is Ying Yan? Heavy.

[Revel]

Liberalism = We + Will + Destroy + you

[MikelTackNailer]

“42”

[Reeses]

All models are wrong at some level. Someone that thinks linking wrong models together is important has a complete misunderstanding of how tools are used. That’s like welding a hammer to a screw driver, and declaring yourself brilliant.