“Three of the seven people Heritage filmed later said they had misspoken..”
I believe we are missing the part about who told them to say they had misspoken.
Why should that matter? If the claims that our side makes about election integrity crumble so easily, then maybe they are not very convincing. How about having rock solid evidence?
But we didn't miss the part about ...Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, called the video “a stunt.
He has a lot to worry about.
We can take Brad Raffensburger’s word for it.
He doesn’t lie at all.
I believe we are missing the part about who told them to say they had misspoken.
The New York Times complains about Heritage misleading people, but here they are deliberately misleading people themselves.
Yes, when they didn't know they were on a hidden camera, they told the truth. When the Lying New York Times made them aware they were on a hidden camera saying something that could cause them trouble, suddenly they say they "misspoke", and the lying New York Times presents it as a legitimate statement.
Did they verify that info?