Why should that matter? If the claims that our side makes about election integrity crumble so easily, then maybe they are not very convincing. How about having rock solid evidence?
“How about having rock solid evidence?”
Yeah, right. The NYT would surely present that when proven .
Who said it crumbled, the enemy?
Jr. are you an dad’s computer again?
But they did not crumble. Do not forget evidence can be twisted to match the “facts” either side claim to be the absolute truth. If this was not so the world would have no need of lawyers.
Wait. You believe the Lying New York Times? I immediately regard anything they say as lies.
Yes, the people who would get in trouble *CHANGED* their statement to one that would *NOT* get them into trouble once the New York Times informed them that their statement would get them into trouble.
And you think the Lying New York Times debunked the issue so easily?
I think the Lying New York Times (voice of the corrupt deep state) hasn't debunked anything. They just convinced these people to say otherwise by pointing out they had been filmed undercover.
The Undercover statement, when they didn't know they were being filmed, is the truthful one. The statement coaxed out of them by the Lying New York Times, is the false one.