Posted on 08/28/2024 10:32:59 AM PDT by Red Badger
When you look at that last chart and combine the monthly data points it looks remarkably close to averaging zero degrees change over the one year period Sep 23 to Aug 24. It’s just a sine wave cycle.
Bfl
Doesn’t matter. They’ll just change the lie to fit the scenario.
They need more research grant money so they can understand what is happening.
The forever 14yo climate-tard Greta always begs to differ!
The amount of heat generated and the rate released by the core of the earth has more to do with ice thickness and climate patterns than anything else. There are many undersea volcanoes and “smokers”. If ocean temperatures are declining, then the earth’s core is probably not generating as much heat. The mechanism of how and when this heat is generated in not well understood.
Mother earf finally feels safe to heal herself after we removed CFCs from asthma inhalers and AquaNet.
In addition to these things, there is precession of the equinoxes and the wobble in the earths axis.
"Variations in the climate of the Sahara region can, at the simplest level, be attributed to the changes in insolation because of slow shifts in Earth's orbital parameters. The parameters include the precession of the equinoxes, obliquity, and eccentricity as put forth by the Milankovitch theory.[2] The precession of the equinoxes is regarded as the most important orbital parameter in the formation of the "green Sahara" and "desert Sahara" cycle."
More at link.
To listen to the “climate scientists” we would be running ships in an ice-free Northwest Passage and the Russians would be running ships in an ice-free Northeast Passage.
The Russians do run ships in the Northeast Passage but with the help of nuclear-powered ice breakers.
This is why they changed from “Global Warming” to “Climate Change”. Just wait, they’ll come up with some reason why human activity is causing this, and we should all give up our cars to stop it.
This is going to put AOC out of business?
Also can we now stop the new home no NG nonsense?
From the book of Thunbergians: Greta wept.
Presenting data without error bars should be a criminal offense.
What we have here are very small variations without any information as to the accuracy of the measuring equipment itself, the inaccuracies of the measurement methods, etc. (I spent 10 years of my life as an experimental nuclear physicist, and there is no such thing as a “precise” measurement. There are always errors connected to everything, and a smart guy by the name of
Gauss gave us error propagation calculation centuries ago. Use it.)
There could well be a +/- 1° possible inaccuracy, which would render pretty much all of that data, or rather the conclusions drawn therefrom, mostly worthless.
Also, suppressing the origin, as in the first graphic, should be another criminal offense.
Facts don’t matter, only climate models matter.
Natural cycles have only been accurately catalogued for about a hundred years. And when the results did not match their “models”, they lied about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.