NIH censorship of critics unconstitutional, appeals court says, HHS sued for COVID coverup records

Just the News ^ | August 21, 2024 11:00pm | Greg Piper

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The National Institutes of Health doesn't want you to use the words "animal," "testing" or "cruel" in comments on its social media pages. Too bad, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit told the agency.

Animal experimentation is at the heart of First Amendment and Freedom of Information Act litigation against the feds, with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals recently defeating NIH in court and Judicial Watch suing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for stonewalling its requests for communications about an alleged COVID-19 coverup.

Neither agency responded to Just the News queries for their response to the legal developments.

Conservatives and animal rights activists have become strange bedfellows in recent years, sometimes on the same issue or just the same principle. 

PETA and Animal Outlook supported Project Veritas this year in a friend-of-the-court brief at the 9th Circuit against an Oregon law that prohibits "unannounced audiovisual recording" in public, except when the target is an on-duty cop or a life-threatening felony is taking place.

Like the undercover conservative sting organization, known for exposing a Pfizer executive discussing its plans to "mutate" COVID to protect its "cash cow," the animal rights groups go undercover to document and expose cruelty and crimes against animals, they said.

[FES0844]

Dr. Fauchi’s wife Christine Grady works at NIH. I wonder what experiments she works on.

[OneVike]

The left has divided people into so many groups to divide and conquer, that even groups that don’t agree politically are joining the battle in the war against the left.

You can’t make this crap up.

Reality is always stranger than fiction.