[Robert DeLong]

Since they really do not have a way of testing it, because they had to make assumptions in its development to this point. It might be workable down the road, but it's a starting point for now. I will never live to see that workable model. Right now I would have more faith in the Climate Change models, and I admit I have little if any faith in that one.

However, this clearly shows that the human brain beats AI. For man is the one that determines what is needed for the AI to function correctly (and it still falls short on many occasions). The same holds true with this endeavor as well.

Interesting endeavor though I must admit.

[Red Badger]

It just looks for patterns and tries to correlate those patterns with known areas of genetic responsibility.

Much more efficient at it than a human is............