*vanity* Kamala Harris ethnicity

[Kevin in California]

So I Google the following "Kamala Harris ethnicity" and this is what came up.

"Ms Harris is the first black and Asian-American vice-president, with Indian and Jamaican-born parents."

WTH? Can someone tell me WTH this means?

[John S Mosby]

Jamaican does not mean black— there are a lot of blacks who live there and are natives, but there are also whites, other Europeans, etc. who live there and are... Jamaicans.

Assumption that jamaican means black is part of this deception to bridge to black. She went to Howard Univ- trad black college— attended by many whites, btw who graduate same as any other. Again— melding the description. fwiw- which is a lot to the desperate dems.

[Secret Agent Man]

It appears the left also doesn’t know what a black or indian person is, either.

[logi_cal869]

Notice the shift to ‘black’ from ‘african American’...

...the latter of which they never use to describe legs-up.

[9YearLurker]

She’s biracial. Is that really so difficult?

[FreedomCalls]

Did anyone in Dave Chappelle's racial draft choose her yet? Asian, white, black - she could be drafted by either team.

[RoosterRedux]

She's not African-American and she was never disadvantaged in any way.

Her father was a tenured Stanford professor and her mother was a scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab scientists have won fifteen Nobel prizes in physics and chemistry).

She is academic royalty by virtue of her parents and her father was from a family of plantation owners in Jamaica.

[USMC79to83]

[Chgogal]

FYI

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/hold-kamala-harris-father-claims-his-family-descends-irish-slave-owner-jamaica

[batazoid]

This means that Kamala Harris is a naturalized citizen at birth, according to the first section of the 14th Amendment. As such, she is disqualified to run for the presidency. If she weren’t that would mean she is a jus soli subject, i.e., place of birth, to an empirical presidency rather than a jus sanguinis citizen (right of blood) by consent. There was no ‘consent’ in Kamala Harris’ citizenship from her foreign, noncitizen parents.

I am sure ruling-class Democrats and most established Republicans would like to think of their voters as subjects rather than citizens by consent. It makes ruling a whole lot easier.

[Tell It Right]

What Kevin is saying is that it wasn’t too long ago that the Dims would deride conservative blacks who weren’t descendants of U.S. slaves by saying they weren’t “authentically black” or not really African American as the Dims define it. Now, of course, the Dims don’t say that because they need their hero to be black.

[Fresh Wind]

It means that Obamala can claim to be whatever race she chooses according to the situation she finds herself in. Right now, being “black” is the most advantageous, so that’s what she is.

[BerryDingle]

I’ve read rumors she was born in Montreal, Quebec. She admits she grew up there. I don’t see any problem asking for a long form birth certificate.

[Rummyfan]

I think she would be better suited working pouring drinks for sailors in a dive bar on some dilapidated third world tropical waterfront.

Hey.now that’s good honest work…. Too good for Que - Mala.

[MD Expat in PA]

Kevin, it’s time we’ve had “the talk”. Sometimes a man and a woman meet, and they fall in love, they get married and 9 months later a stork comes along and…

[cymbeline]

“It doesn’t matter. Stay focused on the ISSUES. Nobody cares what she calls herself except democrats.”

I agree except if she tells one audience she’s Indian and another audience she’s black, that deserves to be called out.

But yes, it’s a minor matter compared to the issues.

[nickcarraway]

Al Sharpton said Obama wasn’t authentically black. That didn’t seem to stop him any.

[satan]

Indira Harris

[maddog55]

Ms Harris? It should have started with...identifies as..

[Fresh Wind]

...her father was from a family of slave owning plantation owners in Jamaica.

[batazoid]

WoW, I sent MSN a howling scared. A couple of hours ago I was amazed to see this headline article on the MSN platform "The Rise of Neobirtherism". My response was the first and, if I may say so myself, it was a killer response. I will post it below, but before I do, since then the fine people at MSN changed the title of the article and erased all the responses, including mine. Which, by the way, was the only pro-Trumpian response of the lot...that's how good it was. The thrust of the article was that this new birthism (neobirtherism) was just another form of racism. Here is what I wrote. It's far too long, I know, but I was having fun. "There is nothing racial about requiring "natural" citizenship at birth to be of citizen-parents. Most Black Americans are natural-born citizens. Michelle Obama is a natural-born citizen while Barack Obama and Kamala Harris are not. "When the term was first added to the Presidential Qualification clause in Article II, it was to prevent foreigners from obtaining the presidency since the office of the Commander-in-Chief had just been added to the president's official duties. At that time, only the nationality of males determined citizenship. It wasn't until 1922, with the passage of the Cable Act, that the nationality of women entered into the equation of citizenship. After that point, a "natural" citizen at birth required both parents to be U.S. citizens before the birth of their offspring(s) within the jurisdiction. "In this regard, both Barack Obama and Kamala Harris are Section I, Amendment XIV citizens at birth (i.e., Birthright citizens.) by the plenary power of the state, not by natural right. That is to say, naturalized citizens at birth rather than "natural" citizens at birth. If this was not the case, it would mean we are still 'jus soli' subjects (place of birth) to an empirical presidency, rather than 'jus sanguinis' citizens (right of blood) by consent in a constitutional Republic."