Posted on 07/27/2024 3:53:59 AM PDT by hardspunned
Stricter COVID-19 restrictions could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives in the states that refused to institute them, though efforts to close nursing homes and schools likely caused more harm than good, a new study has found. Between 118,000 and 248,000 more Americans would have survived the pandemic if all states had followed some restrictions practiced in Northeastern states, according to findings published Friday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
 Hey! FReepers! Help Fill The Tank! How About It? Huh? It Ain't Askin' Too Much Ya Know.... Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Total BS.
This is why nobody can trust these institutions ever again.
And major city crime is down, illegals will generate a trillion dollars of tax revenue.
The gaslighting is in overdrive.
The shot itself more than likely killed at least that many......and there were people right here on FR telling us what fools we were for not “trusting the science”.
Few days go by I don’t thank God for giving me the wisdom to avoid such a danger.
What a load of BS.it had been proved by the CDC that Masks don’t work and neither did the MRNA injections that were forced upon the people.
Those injections caused the deaths of thousands of people.
Leftist Journalist Who Regularly Harassed the ‘Unvaccinated’ Dies Suddenly at 43
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4254420/posts
The perfect crime for DEPOPULATION. Plausible deniability. Nuremberg 2.0
RIP DG
RIP DF
DEI shoddy research on display. This study supports totalitarian government with unlimited power. The AMA has no credibility.
The basic problem with these studies is that they assume no unintended consequences. Most obviously, no bad reactions to the vaccine. But also, no bad reactions to forced isolation.
I’m going to refer to what I’ll call Sowell’s Law, that there are no easy answers, only trade-offs. (Actually, Gary Becker is the originator of this law, but we have another law in economics, named Stigler’s law, that no law in economics is named after its originator.)
I don’t 100 percent agree with Sowell on everything. Just 99 percent of time.
Yes, there are some easy answers, but these are rare. And the idea that do-gooders are always coming with easy answers is foolish and even dangerous. Whenever somebody says “Why can’t we ...,” as though there is no cost, they’re just revealing themselves to be fools.
I’ll give an example, for a time, the stupid reason given for any proposed new program was, if we could put a man on the moon, we can come up it a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. The proper response is that if we didn’t spend all the money we spent on sending a man to the moon, maybe we could have spent that money on research on Alzheimer’s disease. A choice was involved.
Of course, another choice would be that we could have lowered taxes.
indeed they are...and we must not allow it.
one way or another, they intend to cull the elderly, at the very least, and continue to weaken the immune systems of the middle aged and youth.
NO.
Okay I admit that I actually read the article. Damn, now I have a splitting headache. Who reads let alone believes this crap? Duh, that’s right Dems and the Left suck this stuff up.
OMG, it was so full of caveats, conjecture and speculation that if they published an article about gravity their conclusion would be that gravity doesn’t exist, simply the Earth sucks!!!
Sadly, the consumers/believers in this crap VOTE! I found the 36% who STILL think Joey is great! 🤮
Agree 1000%. Comes out because Kamala is running for President.
They are getting ready for the next pandemic and accompanying masking, vaxx mandates and lockdowns.
Since the masks did nothing and the vaccine did nothing, it is hard to see what they’re basing this on.
This is counter factual fairy dust BS.
Released is timed so they can use info to attack Republican governors of these states .
Do you know that early intervention in Covid 19 infections with Ivermectin and Zinc would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives?
JAMA has published NOTHING about that fact. JAMA supported the denial of IVM to the general populace. If Ivermectin had been legalized to sell over the counter we would have had hundreds of thousands of people alive today who are now needlessly dead.
So where is JAMA on that issue? They are still arse sucking Big Pharm.
Meanwhile the truth is easy to see right here:
Maybe we can change the insulation on the fuel tank of the Space Shuttle Columbia, because the old stuff might be bad for the ozone layer.
The new stuff is just as good (then why was it not specified originally?), so there is no down side…
Disaster ensues…
sweden didn’t lock down and did better than just about anyone in the world
https://www.cato.org/commentary/sweden-avoided-covid-lockdowns-now-reaps-benefits
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.