Posted on 07/25/2024 2:50:24 PM PDT by simpson96
Jennifer Aniston has criticised Donald Trump’s vice-presidential candidate, JD Vance, for resurfaced comments calling Democrats a "bunch of childless cat ladies with miserable lives".
The Friends actress, 55, posted a 2021 interview with Mr Vance that has been widely shared since his selection as Mr Trump's running mate for November's presidential election.
"I truly can’t believe that this is coming from a potential VP of the United States," she wrote on Instagram. "All I can say is… Mr Vance, I pray that your daughter is fortunate enough to bear children of her own one day." Mr Vance has a two-year-old daughter, and two sons. "I hope she will not need to turn to IVF as a second option," Ms Aniston wrote.
"Because you are trying to take that away from her, too." 'Country miserable'
The actress has previously spoken openly about her struggles while trying to have children through in-vitro fertilisation (IVF).
Last month, Mr Vance voted to block Democrat-proposed legislation to guarantee access to IVF nationwide. In the clip, Mr Vance criticised Vice-President Kamala Harris because she has no biological children.
Ms Harris is stepmother to her husband Doug Emhoff’s two children.
But Mr Vance told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson the US was run by "a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too".
"Look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez], the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children," he said. "How does it make any sense we've turned our country over to people who don’t really have a direct stake in it?"
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
So am I.
By attacking Democrats?
Yes.
From any and all angles
Yes.
Looks like there’re a lot of stealth Democrat operatives or sympathizers around here.
“ there are plenty of childless cat ladies here that are going to vote for Trump”
I think they’re a lot more than childless cat ladies.
They may have a cat or two and may not have kids, but they’re not childless cat ladies.
Is Vance a Caveman?
I have heard from several sources before this came out, that a VP usually does not help the ticket but can hurt the ticket.
Trump is more political savvy than this caveman he chose as VP.
Trump is probably regretting not waiting to choose his VP until the Biden situation was clear. Nikki Haley as VP is a winning ticket for Harris at top of Dem ticket.
Trump can still change his VP pick.
“Childless cat ladies from the South are often conservative.”
I’m not a childless cat lady FROM the south. Am a childless cat lady IN the south. Conservative. There are many like me here.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, especially when it’s on a regular, recurring basis.
“BUMP for J.D. Vance and his incredible life experiences.”
Much like Obama’s.
“Abandoned by his father to a troubled single mother; eventually raised by grandparents. He is then recruited from an Ivy league law school by shadow figures, a specific billionaire and a network of interests. He changes his name, writes a book about his life story, and with the support of the aforementioned – who eventually pays for the assembly of a strategic campaign influence network, becomes a Senator for 2 years before being quickly elevated into position in the White House.”
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/19/the-mirror/
He believes in a theory that has a name. It’s called Demeny voting. This would mean Nick Cannon with his 12 kids would get more votes than a voter with no children.
It gets complicated if his various baby mommas want to vote their children a different way.
He is not done procreating. He could have a lot of votes under JD Vance 2021 view.
And how do you deal with the single moms who have 5 kids from different daddies that have split and are dead beats. How do we ensure said children only have one vote either from Daddy or Momma.
We can’t even ensure that illegal immigrants don’t vote.
Well, she states she wanted children but was unable to have them.
BTW, JD ... great line.
American citizen population is getting smaller because the younger generation of Americans think it’s too hard on their lifestyle to have kids.
Hispanic citizens are still having kids at good rate.
Illegals are bringing in tons of kids plus having anchor babies.
Illegals and Hispanic citizens have and are contributing to the most growth by far to our population.
Jennifer wanted children, tried to have children and is unable to have children. This is not the same as those ppl who chose to not have children. She shouldn’t be vilified fornot being able to have children.
However, she can be ridiculed and vilified for getting her facts wrong and spreading misinformation.
It is possible she had PCOS. Although, she never looked like she had a weight problem that often happens with it. Nowadays there are better ways to deal with PCOS.
“Looks like there’re a lot of stealth Democrat operatives or sympathizers around here.”
Yep. People who jump to every media sheepwhistle set off by Leon Panetta’s daughter. She was all over this on X.
I’m to the point where these people can just vote for Kamala. They can do it with a smile.
btw, if anyone here has PCOS there is this aspect:
https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/bright-side-to-pcos-paradox-20111017-1lt1w.html
“There is perhaps a evolutionary twist to the prevalence of PCOS among women. Since the condition causes women to ovulate less regularly, they tend to have better fertility than other women later on in their reproductive years. In a manner of speaking, their bodies hold on to their eggs, so they last for longer. One evolutionary explanation is that female bodies adapted to times of famine by increasing insulin resistance to save calories and extend the reproductive years.
“PCOS might have been a good thing to have in times of food scarcity because it allowed the window of fertility to be extended and it allowed women to survive and preproduce in low fuel environments. Today we have calories all around us, and yet the body’s possible adaptation to another time still remains for some women. One way to look at PCOS is as a past adaptation gone astray.” Dr. Sarah Berga says, speaking on PCOS at a recent conference.”
Thanks very much for the ping/link, MayflowerMadam. Hmmm. Information BUMP!
Who gives a rat’s backside what some aging Hollywood bimbo thinks? Only the people who think the same way she does already.
My friend is a childless cat lady Democrat who was honest enough to say that Biden has severe Alzheimers and had to go. Smarter by far than that stupid movie person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.