Posted on 07/22/2024 9:33:51 AM PDT by CDR Kerchner
(Jul. 22, 2024) — Trump will have the legal standing in federal courts to do so if she is nominated for that office by the DNC. And Trump should do so to force SCOTUS to take up the issue of the “natural born Citizen” term as it applies to whom can constitutionally serve as the President and Commander in Chief (and VP per the 12th Amendment) and resolve it. The courts evaded the issue using “lack of standing by the plaintiffs” for Obama and then also for Harris for VP. They should not do that again. Former Chief Justice Marshall‘s words from the past tell them they should not evade the issue.
To Kamala Harris: Fool the voting electorate once, shame on you. Fool the voting electorate twice, shame on us. She owes allegiance since birth to the English monarch – formerly Queen Elizabeth and now King Charles! Click on the image below for more details.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
If the issue is forced, it will disqualify her for the Presidency (can’t run), and consequently, once settled, she will not be able to continue Vice President. That would elevate the Speaker of the House to the Presidency, until January 20th.
SHE IS AN ANCHOR BABY....PERIOD.
ARTICLE 2
SECTION 1
Clause 5
US CONSTITUTION
I think she was born in Calif. Her Jamacisn father divorced her Indian mother who moved her to Canada where she grew up snd then I think Kamaka cane back to the US for college. I doubt she has loyalty to any country. Just like Obama. Citizen of the world.
CORRECT
If she was born in the U.S, were her parents in the U.S. legally?
I guess they were. They both worked in the US. Their legality is not the issue. The fact that they were NOT citizens is the issue.
Trump needs to call her out on this...and quickly or we will be hosed.
(Let Eric or Don Jr be the messenger, but get her lack of eligibility out there).
This is our last chance..our last.
“Trump Should Challenge Her Constitutional Eligibility”
Only if Trump wants to look like a lunatic and lose!
It is a losing argument.
Focus on the things that matter at this point. She has already been elected to a constitutional office that requires the same things as President. Your point is moot.
If Trump focuses on this, then it comes across as being racist. I adhere to the Dennis Miller rule: Don’t be racist. There are so many other good reasons not to like her; focus on them.
Like Plessy v Ferguson or Roe v Wade.
It is a result of a mental defect among the people who keep bringing it up.
Yes, they refuse to believe *LIES* just because the majority of people around them tell them the *LIES* are true. Serious mental defect, that.
They live in a Fantasy world...
No they don't. As you can see from the page of that law book I posted above, there are authorities who claim the US meaning of "natural born citizen" derives directly from Vattel.
This is *EVIDENCE*, even though *YOU* don't like it. It remains true non the less. There are other examples of *EVIDENCE* which go against your position, but *YOU* don't want to acknowledge them.
YOU are the one who is immutable to truth. You simply want to regurgitate the group think you've been taught all your life, and have no ability to look at something without reference to your programing.
I have been research this topic, and specifically how it relates to Obama since about 2008 when it was determined that he would be the nominee.
I bet few people on this forum or any other can match the length and depth of my reading on this particular subject.
There IS circumstantial evidence that Barack Obama was born in Canada. There is not enough to prove it, but certainly enough to make it seem like a plausible explanation for all the evidence we have on the topic.
Parental nationality is irrelevant.
It surprises me how persistent this idea comes up that the nationality of someone's parents will overrule the actual birthplace of an individual.
If there was some case law that was clear, maybe it might be worth looking into. But this stuff has been going on since Obama ran, and it has never persuaded anyone with authority to do something about it.
When will this idea be dropped once and for all?
It's not new. It's one of the earliest theories out there. It may be new to you, but this is likely because you haven't kept up with the issue as well as some others have.
We know for a fact that Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was in Seattle on August 19th, 1961, and we know this because she registered as a college student on that date.
Obama was born August 5th, so how did his mom get to Seattle by August 19th of that same month?
More importantly, why would a woman who just gave birth leave her family and live alone in Seattle with an infant rather than getting help from her husband or family?
That is not how things would work out. There is a dominant mindset in the legal community that being born in the United States makes you a "natural born citizen."
This is wrongheaded and incorrect, but it is never the less the dominant opinion of the legal community throughout the country.
Take this to court, and you will lose.
I agree with you here, but only on this particular point.
It’s time this was adjudicated.
Focus on the things that matter at this point. She has already been elected to a constitutional office that requires the same things as President. Your point is moot.
If Trump focuses on this, then it comes across as being racist. I adhere to the Dennis Miller rule: Don’t be racist. There are so many other good reasons not to like her; focus on them.
This is all correct. Exactly correct.
t is a losing argument.
Focus on the things that matter at this point. She has already been elected to a constitutional office that requires the same things as President. Your point is moot.
If Trump focuses on this, then it comes across as being racist. I adhere to the Dennis Miller rule: Don’t be racist. There are so many other good reasons not to like her; focus on them.
Harris is an anchor baby...period. We looked the other way when obama had every record sealed..so as not to be called a racist.. We are where we are today because of that caper. If Heels is “Elected”, we are thru as a Contitutional republic..and as a nation.
(Unless she is called out due to eligibility, it won’t be many more cycles before an MS-13 illegal can run for President, and win).
(No, I’m not hysterical..just an aging patriot who loves what is left of our beloved country).
I don't know of any effort to adjudicate this so far...
Correct. She was taken to Canada and raised there by her Citizen of India, non-U.S. Citizen, mother and only returned to the U.S. to attend college. She has minimal affinity to the USA’s founding principles and is an enabler of the New World Order controlling the USA, as is Obama. While there and graduating from high school in Canada, she also should be asked if her mother became a Canadian citizen and if so, did she Kamala become one too. More questions that need answers to from a person who wants to be Commander in Chief of of military. This is a national security issue!
We the People Need More Information About the Backgrounds of Candidates for the Highest Political Offices.
Transparency Requirements for Candidates for President and Vice-President – More Is Needed in Our Modern Electoral Process – Filing The (OGE) Financial Disclosure Form 278e Is Mandatory – The (OPM) National Security Questionnaire Form SF-86 Should Also Be Mandatory: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2023/05/07/transparency-requirements-for-candidates-for-president-and-vice-president-more-is-needed-in-our-modern-electoral-process-filing-the-oge-financial-disclosure-form-278e-is-mandatory-the-opm-na/
If you don’t like the Constitution, nor the laws it laid down, WHY ARE YOU HERE on FreeRepublic dot com?
It is the method that most of the world uses, and which most of the world has used going all the way back to the ancient Greeks.
It also makes far more sense than just declaring anyone born on your land to be a member of your family.
and it has never persuaded anyone with authority to do something about it.
And that is the rub of it. They are perfectly content to believe they understand the issue, even when they do not.
As Reagan said:
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant... it's that they know so much which isn't so."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.