I see no connection between this conspiracy theory about the lady in the stands, and ‘ignoring election fraud’.
We have no idea what she thinks, or if she knows anything at all about this.
You could probably write a thesis about many issues on FR; I don’t think this is a good one to choose.
I think there’s an attitude behind the “oh it’s just a conspiracy theory” thing, regardless of what the particular “conspiracy theory” is.
We’ve gotten so lazy and divided that we don’t listen to each other’s questions any more. Even if we have the ability to respectfully provide evidence that will allay their suspicions, we instead flip them the bird and call them conspiracy theorists. That is so disrespectful.
The left thought that election fraud was just a conspiracy theory. The evidence was never allowed to be heard in court because it was just a “conspiracy theory”. All the stuff that we conservatives have been pointing out is ridiculed by the left as just conspiracy theory.
Calling something a conspiracy theory means you don’t have to weigh any evidence or answer anybody’s questions. It’s lazy. And even after we found out that Russia collusion, Mueller’s investigation, the falsified records for FISA warrants, etc were all genuine criminal conspiracies, the perpetrators got off with a slap on the wrist at most. People see that and now EVERYBODY believes the powers-that-be are capable of doing all kinds of conspiracies without anybody ever proving or disproving them with evidence and facts.
This particular issue (of this woman’s behavior) is small, but when you’ve had such big conspiracies overlooked and pooh-poohed you will get people second-guessing EVERYTHING. Which sets us all on shaky ground because of the minds of the people. The lies have broken the minds of our people. We have no reason to trust that the truth will ever be known, and contrary to the views of post-modernism, everybody creating and believing in their own personal “reality” doesn’t work. We have to have things we can know as a people. We are entitled to our own opinions but not our own facts, as Ronald Reagan said (IIRC).
In short (I know; it’s too late. lol) my “thesis” is about how we got to a point of not listening to each other, not caring if another person is honestly confused and seeking answers in good faith, and so divided that we can’t talk rationally with each other in this nation. This is where Alinsky deliberately brought us, and until we understand it and actively fight against it, we will NEVER have healing and the country will be destroyed just as Alinsky intended.