Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/17/2024 2:23:08 PM PDT by rxsid
ππππ ππ: Video emerges suggesting there may have been a second shooter...
Are we witnessing another FBI coverup?
Credits: https://t.co/xax8TiBTrr pic.twitter.com/sVviEavqeqβ legislation (@legislationpage) July 17, 2024
multiple eyewitnesses ...
ππππ ππ: Multiple witnesses now coming forward backing up reports of a second shooter.
Developing... https://t.co/amupwuiABS pic.twitter.com/ubOwmGCMKDβ legislation (@legislationpage) July 17, 2024
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
From CNN.com: Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.
The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final "acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.
Audio analysis has also confirmed that the gunman was about 360 to 393 feet from the podium, according to forensics expert Robert Maher.
This conclusion aligns with CNN's analysis that the gunman was on a rooftop 393 to 492 feet from the podium when shots rang out.
The shots exemplify a "crack-pop' sequence, typical when a supersonic bullet passes a microphone, before the "arrival of the corresponding muzzle blast sound," Maher, who teaches audio forensics at Montana State University, told CNN.
The time between these markers places the shooter 110 to 120 meters from the microphone, Maher said, assuming the bullet is moving at an average speed of 800 to 1,000 meters per second, the equivalent of 2,600 to 3,280 feet per second.
Total garbage, you should be better than this.
He was on the grassy knoll
Grassy knoll bump.
I thought the 3 guns from forensics were the shooter’s gun and two sniper (police/SS) guns. Which is old news.
I heard it was penguins in bondage.
So, it’s been more than 60 years since the JFK assassination, and we’re still not sure who did it, how many, from where, etc. Why would anyone think the same bunch of government bunglers (or worse) would figure this attempted assassination out in less than a week? And tell anyone the truth? Well?
Three spaced shots from Crooks, 5 from sniper 1 and after a pause, a final shot from sniper 2.
Total garbage, you should be better than this.
****************
What’s garbage about it? There’s a perfectly logical explanation for 3 weapons fired. The shooter and the two sniper teams. We still don’t know which team took him out. They both could have returned fire.
Stands to reason...
The biden-obama WH cabal of communists & other perverts would have been expected to be thorough...
Bots are busy all over social media sites posting garbage.
Until I could see the angle I speak of and am convinced the forklift hit was out of plane with the bleachers I can keep open the distinct possibility that there was at least a second assassin shooter. The third, C, that is mentioned here was the SS sniper taking the kid out with one shot?
The headline is implying that the foresics finding of 3 guns is supporting the idea of a second (or third) shooter.
Was it someone inside the building shooting at Trump, knowing within seconds the patsy would be eliminated?
Knowing the evil running this government, at this point nothing would surprise me.
They all want Trump dead. It’s become inordinately clear and everyone knows it.
3 weapons? Does that include the SS snipers?
Gassy Troll. ππ
I don’t believe it. Considering how much of Trump’s body and head were exposed while the short SS lady was failing to cover Trump, that “other shooters” DID NOT take that opportunity to shoot him I’m calling BS.
The FBI even immediately said he acted alone even though they couldn't unlock his phone, for example. Put our full faith and trust in them, we should, and don't question anything.
I agree. Garbage post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.