Posted on 07/14/2024 7:11:29 PM PDT by political1
 Hey! FReepers! Help Fill The Tank! How About It? Huh? It Ain't Askin' Too Much Ya Know.... Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Absolutely!
Since their main plan has, thus far, failed, getting him into a 4 year jai sentence will provide the communists with endless opportunities to silence Trump permanently...
Remember, communists may fail in one circumstance, but will have multiple plans for a failure scenario...
The biden-obama communists are like termites...
There is only one solution...
At this point sentencing is on hold to September. The judge further said “if required”.
Court proceedings will be needed to resolve the admissibility of evidence that was allowed into the record by Merchan over defense objections.
Much of that evidence will most likely be classified as subject to Presidential privilege by the criterion established by the recent SC ruling and therefore will be inadmissible.
Since the jury based their verdict on that evidence most likely the verdict will be set aside.
WE WERE INCHES FROM A HOT CIVIL WAR!
I would think Trump’s lawyers would be correct in saying jail time for Trump would mean an automatic death sentence in the prison system considering what happened yesterday. A political enemy could pay off another prisoner and/or their family and they would drop Trump in a heartbeat.
George Washington wasn't nothing to sneeze at either. At the Battle of Princeton, he sat atop his horse while British bullets whizzed past him.
In a heartbeat!
Wondering the same... First, the court cases. Now, an attempted assassination. What’s next? The judge sends him to prison?
Exactly. They must stop Trump. They missed an opportunity. He will go to jail and/they will try again. He cannot be allowed to become President.
If you strike the King you must kill him! Emerson.
Yes.
Biden’s comments about respecting political opponents is bogus.
Jailing your opponents is the flip side of assassinating them.
One political stunt at a time, please. We’ll cross that screw job when we get to it.
Well, the actual ‘legal expenses’ entry was made in 2017, after he was elected. Not that that was an illegal act just because the commies say so.
The evidence that was improperly elicited intimately concerned his presidency. How he did business as a president via Hope Hicks and many privileged conversations with other people in the white house. They used those testimonies to try and show that Trump was aware that something wrong was being done and caused it to be done. Very unconvincingly I might add.
The entries were after he was already President so how is it believable that they were falsified to protect his run for President?
Trump did not even make the entries; his bookkeeper was the one who noted them as legal expenses. The bookkeeper testified that he classified them that way because they were paid to the lawyer. Trump had nothing to do with how they were classified as the bookkeeper attested.
The testimony from people who worked for Trump on official matters is prohibited. The prosecutors said at closing the Hope Hicks testimony was damning. If that is so the verdict cannot stand since her testimony is protected by executive privilege. Since Trump is not sentenced the verdict can be set aside.
Interesting. You may have a point. The assassination attempt was only two days after the original sentencing date.
I think it would be much worse if it was dismissed due to executive privilege. That would imply it was legitimate in the first place.
Floor drains
Short aswer= no.
Long answer= Hell no!
Silly post we should be in a hot civil war NOW
I pray no.
I don’t see it that way.
The judge abused Trump’s rights, refused to allow defense witnesses, gave corrupt and illegal instructions to the jury, showed extreme bias in his treatment of the defense c/w the prosecution, and abused the law repeatedly during the trial.
The verdict is corrupted by inadmissible testimony and based on instructions that misrepresent the law.
The verdict should be set aside on any of these issues and would be overturned on appeal based on the frank judicial malfeasance and misconduct.
I can’t imagine that anyone, including the jurors thinks Trump is guilty. They just wanted to get Trump, as one juror confessed. I listened to the entirety of the trial every day. It was a kangaroo court, just an exercise in making the judge’s daughter millions of $ and getting Trump off the campaign trail while throwing mud at him in the hope some would stick.
Agreed. I don’t think even the ‘Rats desire to rule the ashes of what was once a nation. And, even if they did, martyrdom tends to change the resolve of a people, in favor of the martyr. There will be an internal push to wind these down, take the L, and prepare a quagmire for the Trump administration to navigate. Remember, the Beltway is brimmed to the “tippy top” with careerists. Trump will fill the blue coffers, paradoxically, because he will return wealth to Americans. A win-win situation. I think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.