Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JayGalt

I think it would be much worse if it was dismissed due to executive privilege. That would imply it was legitimate in the first place.


34 posted on 07/14/2024 7:51:26 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

I don’t see it that way.
The judge abused Trump’s rights, refused to allow defense witnesses, gave corrupt and illegal instructions to the jury, showed extreme bias in his treatment of the defense c/w the prosecution, and abused the law repeatedly during the trial.
The verdict is corrupted by inadmissible testimony and based on instructions that misrepresent the law.
The verdict should be set aside on any of these issues and would be overturned on appeal based on the frank judicial malfeasance and misconduct.
I can’t imagine that anyone, including the jurors thinks Trump is guilty. They just wanted to get Trump, as one juror confessed. I listened to the entirety of the trial every day. It was a kangaroo court, just an exercise in making the judge’s daughter millions of $ and getting Trump off the campaign trail while throwing mud at him in the hope some would stick.


39 posted on 07/14/2024 8:06:36 PM PDT by JayGalt (DEI = Didn’t Earn It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson