Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump was robbed. Juan Merchan Federal Charge
Vanity | 6/3/24 | Self with Docs

Posted on 06/03/2024 8:06:55 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano

Juan Merchan instructs the Jury to consider (1) a violation of the FEDERAL Election Campaign Act (FECA).

IMG-0812



Now, the FECA Federal Statute takes over completely to determine if it was violated criminally.
When you look at the FECA Act right on Justice.gov website, you see immediately, for a Violation to be a crime, it must meet two criteria, the actions must have been committed willfully and KNOWINGLY.



IMG-0819



They reiterate this throughout and explain the accused must have known his/her actions were against the law and this must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.



IMG-0821



Below are Judge Merchan’s full instructions on this other crime (FECA Violation).

Do you see the word “knowingly?”

That’s because it’s not there. He misled the Jury.



IMG-0823



He misleads the Jury.




Merchan kept digging. He tells them this “other crime” doesn’t need to be proven, or even committed, or even concealed - only that they believe he intended to violate the FECA - which is 180 degrees in opposition to the FEC Act.
IMG-0817





TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: tldr; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
They cite Violations of a Federal ACT, and then mislead about that Act and use a wholly different standard than the Act mandates.

In fact, the Act calls out a 5 year statute of limitations that tolls before Trump in charged in 2023.

1 posted on 06/03/2024 8:06:55 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Wouldn’t this be precedent for border states to enforce immigration laws ?


2 posted on 06/03/2024 8:10:22 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Weak sauce.


3 posted on 06/03/2024 8:10:31 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man; Liz

Ping


4 posted on 06/03/2024 8:10:55 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment Inquiry is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

The Supreme Court is going to put a stop to this charade long before the sentencing hearing.


5 posted on 06/03/2024 8:12:07 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

bfl


6 posted on 06/03/2024 8:13:03 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

This is huge

Merchan removed a key element of the crime and said it didn’t need to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.


7 posted on 06/03/2024 8:13:58 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment Inquiry is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Shouldn’t the fact that this judge made a charge a violation of a Federal Act make it ripe to be turned over to SCOTUS?


8 posted on 06/03/2024 8:15:21 AM PDT by dforest ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
Shouldn’t the fact that this judge made a charge a violation of a Federal Act make it ripe to be turned over to SCOTUS?

SCOTUS would need to be presented a reason to hear the case.

9 posted on 06/03/2024 8:16:37 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

The left just keep stealing from Trump, why? Because they can, because they control all the power and can ruin anyone that tries to help him. Laws? The left don’t recognize no steenking laws when it comes to them, but when it comes to prosecuting others, they make up their own laws! H3ck, they invent new laws in order to persecute those that they despise, like making something that has run past the statute of limitations “legal” to prosecute because of their new law!

The ,eft have waged a hostile takeover of this nation- again, why? Because they can. Just like when foreigners invade a country with bad intentions to overthrow the gov, the left have done so here and fully intend to overthrow our once great nation.


10 posted on 06/03/2024 8:18:04 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Refute THIS.

I’ll get around to your lame responses elsewhere, you slimy liberal toad.


11 posted on 06/03/2024 8:18:13 AM PDT by Lazamataz (We're next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Absolutely.

And he can’t modify Federal Laws. He instructed them - a violation of the FECA Act.

NY appellate courts aren’t qualified to interpret federal laws and its outside their Jurisdiction.


12 posted on 06/03/2024 8:18:15 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment Inquiry is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

What reason could that be? I am no attorney.


13 posted on 06/03/2024 8:18:56 AM PDT by dforest ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Where are Trump’s lawyers?


14 posted on 06/03/2024 8:20:43 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
What reason could that be? I am no attorney.

You might check what Mark Levin has been saying about this.

15 posted on 06/03/2024 8:21:09 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

.
The Jurors aren’t allowed to open up law books. They only have his instructions and description of the FECA Act, which is wrong on numerous levels.


16 posted on 06/03/2024 8:22:21 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment Inquiry is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

The Supreme Court is going to put a stop to this charade long before the sentencing hearing.“

You’re dreaming, they should but they won’t.


17 posted on 06/03/2024 8:24:49 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

The other most egregious act by this judge was in speaking against the need for the FEC expert (a former chair, IIRC) to testify. The defense should have still requested his testimony to get a formal Merchan denial on record.


18 posted on 06/03/2024 8:25:04 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Look I am not a lawyer but even I could recognize the instructions to jury just about told them bring back guilty


19 posted on 06/03/2024 8:26:20 AM PDT by mel (There are only 2 races decent and undecent people )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Basically, he said pick one.

How can Trump defend himself when it wasn’t determined what the crime was until the end? And it turns out it was one of three possible crimes?

And if you look at them categorically, not one is a crime.


20 posted on 06/03/2024 8:27:43 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson