Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/25/2024 9:39:56 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Signalman

Pray to God it be so!

Amen!


2 posted on 05/25/2024 9:41:14 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

How nice.

How about exoneration since he didn’t commit a crime?


3 posted on 05/25/2024 9:41:58 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I don’t think it much matters for a sham trial


4 posted on 05/25/2024 9:43:53 AM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

If Trump is acquitted, which is the only reasonable verdict, the heads of liberals/socialists/communists everywhere will spin off their bodies.


5 posted on 05/25/2024 9:44:52 AM PDT by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

It’s a stacked deck. He’ll be convicted because Biden wants it that way. They’ve already got his Oval Office speech written for him.


6 posted on 05/25/2024 9:44:57 AM PDT by Dave911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

It’s what you’d expect under normal circumstances anyway, but this monkey business is all about animus, not justice.


7 posted on 05/25/2024 9:47:15 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

The stack is totally against trump you have a judge in bed with the DA you have his daughter ranking in millions from dems and the judge is going to tell the jury their decision doesn’t have to be unanimous seriously is this Iran or Cuba sometimes it’s hard to tell


11 posted on 05/25/2024 10:16:03 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

We've learned from the Soviet Union.

13 posted on 05/25/2024 10:25:42 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Everything about this trial screams corruption. I would not be surprised to find out the jury has been bribed for a guilty verdict.


14 posted on 05/25/2024 10:53:30 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Well it should be but more likely guilty and then quickly overturned on appeal.


15 posted on 05/25/2024 10:57:13 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I hope he’s right, but I’d be shocked, absolutely shocked!


16 posted on 05/25/2024 12:44:14 PM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

The jury will vote to convict. It is a show trial. The NY jurors know that if any or all vote not guilty, the left already knows their names, where they live, and will come at them with pitchforks. The New York Times and the internet will spread their names widely and it will be near impossible for them to exist in NY.


21 posted on 05/25/2024 2:42:16 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

The unknown with this jury is the two attorneys who were selected. Attorneys are not usually picked for a jury trial. They could be deliberate plants to make sure the jury makes the “correct” decision. Or, the attorneys could be ones who think about how they would feel if it was their client on trial, take note of the fact that no underlying crime was ever identified, and overall see the ridiculousness of the entire case. They could turn the jury by explaining normal evidence and trial procedures.

The obvious bias by the judge, such as his allowing Stormy Daniels to testify when she knew nothing as to the actual charges, may just not sit well with them. In addition, they had to notice the judge then allowed her to meander on past just answering the questions but angrily refused to allow the defense witness any leeway when testifying.

Of course, it depends on how many “orangemanbad” Karen’s are on the jury. If either attorney tries to speak up, one of them might have the attorneys tossed off the jury.


22 posted on 05/25/2024 2:56:39 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson