[Gaffer]

On your last supposition. NO, I do not believe that the USSC need consult or consider outside sources, particularly foreign ones in its determination if a statute, etc. is Constitutional. That’s one of the things I’ve seen from leftist Justices saying they ‘consider other sources.’ The US Constitution is the only document that needs to be consulted here.

[frog in a pot]

Ok, but it is important that you agree the USSC has a role in interpreting the NBC clause (or as many would further argue a duty to address the issue in a properly brought proceeding).

With that, would you agree the Constitution is a contract between the states and not a piece of legislation?

You can see where I am going re rules of interpretation.

I have to run, but I look forward to your response.