Replies

>> His endorsements suck once again. He's terrible at them. <<

I agree with your premise that most of his endorsements "suck" (plenty of his cabinet appointments in his first term were awful, and let's not forget about all the failed "electable" choices he championed during the midterms, like "Dr. Oz" for U.S. Senate). Worse, the AlwaysTrumpers on here will never admit Trump's choices sucked and they shouldn't have blindly cheered on anything and everything he did.

That being said, your current examples are grasping at straws.

>> He's supporting Mike Rogers the Bush-era Neocon in MI <<

And you Rogers bashers conveniently ignore that the fact that Rogers opponent in the primary, Justin Amash, is to Rogers LEFT and routinely voted with "the squad" while in Congress. It's pretty hypocritical for Rand Paul to whine about Rogers having a track record of being "anti-Trump" and ignore the fact that Amash was FAR WORSE when it came to being "anti-Trump", don't you think? What do you expect Trump to do, endorse the pro-Palestinian lunatic who voted with the Democrats to impeach him? On what planet does that make sense? Trump has to deal with the cards he's dealt, and given the FACT that Amash is a Hamas loving traitor, that makes Rogers the lesser of two evils in the primary, so Trump picked the "least bad" option. Shockingly, Bill Clinton didn't endorse any of the members of his own party who voted to impeach him, either. Gosh, Clinton's endorsements must have "sucked", he should have opted for the Democrat who tried to remove him from office, right?

>> He's supportive of Mike Johnson the RINO/Democrat Speaker and was said to have intervened last week to get that foreign aid package passed! <<

And what alternative to Mike Rogers is running for Speaker right now and has the votes to get elected tomorrow if you get Johnson's head on a platter like you want? Be sure to let me know who that person is, and I'll have Trump promptly endorse that person for Speaker. Again, Trump has to deal with the cards he was dealt. You apparently learned nothing from the last disastrous Speakership election, where Matt Gaetz ousted McCarthy without having a clue who would replace him. The GOP has a razor thin majority in the House right now. The RATS will rightfully ridicule the GOP and mock the fact we "can't govern" if we have a THIRD period with endless ballots being cast for "Speaker" and no leadership in place in the House, which would blow up in our faces. Everyone knows that, except you guys attempting a kamikaze move in the House of Representatives, apparently.

I'll agree with the first part, however, McCarthy had to go. He was pitiful. We couldn't imagine getting anyone worse. Just as bad, perhaps, but it was absolutely the correct more to make. What you fail to see is that RINOs are nothing more than Democrats and both are what make up the Uni-party, which is a product of the Deep-State. Either we get control of our nation back, or this nation is gone.

Mike Rogers over Justin Amash, I'm with you there. But only slightly, because I'm not sure that either are a help, although Mike Rogers might be slightly better than Justin Amash.

You are dead wrong on McCarthy though BillyBoy. I tried hard to give Mike Johnson the benefit of the doubt, however, I no longer can stand firmly in his defense.

Here's why both Mike's give me pause for cause:

If Trump is reelected to the White House, I could see both voting with the Democrats to stop him from taking the presidency, because both of them are operationally stupid timid individuals who place party over the people's choice, and the party is not the Republican Party. That only exists within the Freedom Caucus. The party they will stand with is the Uni-party.