Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flashback: Seventeen winners of the Nobel Prize in economics sign letter in support of the President’s Build Back Better package
epi.org ^ | September 20, 2021 | Joseph Stiglitz

Posted on 04/25/2024 8:33:15 AM PDT by lowbridge

The President’s economic agenda, the “Build Back Better” package being debated in Congress, would provide vital public investments in the nation’s physical and human infrastructure, as well as in our tattered safety net. These investments are long overdue—they were needed before the COVID-19 pandemic, and their necessity has been highlighted by the virus and the economic shock that came with it.

Some, however, have invoked fears of inflation as a reason to not undertake these investments. This view is short-sighted. These are importantly supply side measures, increasing the ability of more Americans to participate productively in the economy, helping to improve our low employment-working age population ratio. Significantly reducing the fraction of children growing up in poverty and giving these children access to pre-K and college education will reap large dividends in years to come. We need safe school buildings and bridges, and affordable child and elder care, whether inflation is 2% or 5%. With the investments being financed by tax increases, the inflationary impacts will be at most negligible—over the medium term outweighed by the supply side benefits; and their progressivity will help address one of the country’s critical problems, the growing economic divide. 

The Build Back Better package will provide much needed support to a still-recovering economy, but it will accomplish much more than that. By meeting long-standing social needs, boosting long-term economic performance, and taking serious steps toward addressing the climate crisis we can already see unfolding, it would transform the U.S. economy to be more efficient, equitable, sustainable, and prosperous for the long run, without presenting an inflationary threat.

(Excerpt) Read more at epi.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: biden; buildbackbetter; buildbackworse; economists; nobelprize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: lowbridge

For those keeping score at home, here are the dopes who signed the letter:

George A. Akerlof, Professor, Georgetown University

Sir Angus Deaton, Professor, Princeton University

Peter Diamond, Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Robert Engle, Professor Emeritus and Co-Director of the Volatility and Risk Institute, New York University

Oliver Hart, Professor, Harvard University

Daniel Kahneman, Professor, Princeton University

Eric S. Maskin, Professor, Harvard University

Daniel McFadden, Professor, University of California, Berkley

Paul Milgrom, Professor, Stanford University

Roger Myerson, Professor, University of Chicago

Edmund S. Phelps, Professor and Director of the Center on Capitalism and Society, Columbia University

Paul Romer, Professor, New York University

William Sharpe, Professor Emeritus, Stanford University

Robert Shiller, Professor, Yale University

Christopher Sims, Professor, Princeton University

Robert Solow, Professor Emeritus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Joseph Stiglitz, Professor, Columbia University


21 posted on 04/25/2024 8:56:13 AM PDT by Rockingham (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Everything has been corrupted.
Politicians are liars.
Experts are frauds.
The courts are crooks
The mass media is mass misinformation.
It's like a giant game of Masquerade.
22 posted on 04/25/2024 8:59:41 AM PDT by oldbrowser ( democrats and Democracy are polar opposites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

What a joke.

For what it is worth, here is the sign translation:

Looks like it is after 5 PM, time for a drink. I'll get tight, maybe touch some young girl's breasts, Jill will try to stop me, and the young girl's father will threaten to cut off my right hand. Whaddya gonna do?

23 posted on 04/25/2024 9:02:42 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I wonder if Krugman is one of the 17. I would be shocked if the blithering idiot was not


24 posted on 04/25/2024 9:04:26 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Yep, overeducated, mostly Ivy League, idiots.


25 posted on 04/25/2024 9:11:05 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GrumpyOldGuy
EconJack and I are both free market economists and active participants in Free Republic.
26 posted on 04/25/2024 9:12:31 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Joseph Stiglitz.

I remember his book “Globalization and Its Discontents,” and then he became part of the Globohomo War on Reason.

A real scumbag.


27 posted on 04/25/2024 9:19:38 AM PDT by WarANDPiece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WarANDPiece
Any relation to ...


28 posted on 04/25/2024 9:21:54 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

A reminder that the “Nobel Prize” has become a laughing stock of stupidity and woke ideology.


29 posted on 04/25/2024 9:23:12 AM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Lol. DAMN good movie!

Nah, he’s much worse, but in a different way!


30 posted on 04/25/2024 9:24:01 AM PDT by WarANDPiece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Woke awards for work people. The prize is neither Nobel nor legimate.


31 posted on 04/25/2024 9:32:02 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Larry Summers is having the well deserved last laugh with this fiasco.


32 posted on 04/25/2024 9:43:48 AM PDT by 31R1O (The people who can control themselves ought to be able to defend themselves from those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrumpyOldGuy

You’ve never heard of Ludwig Von Mises or Milton Friedman? Harry Hazlitt?


33 posted on 04/25/2024 9:45:47 AM PDT by 31R1O (The people who can control themselves ought to be able to defend themselves from those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That’s the only reason I kept reading the comments. Hugo!


34 posted on 04/25/2024 10:22:49 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (Trump or Bust! Long live the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

“Experts” are really no longer experts.


35 posted on 04/25/2024 10:25:40 AM PDT by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Remove borders, destroy currencies/institute globull money system, vaccinate until compliance(servitude), until then lawfare against opposition.

Yeah, ummm....FU

36 posted on 04/25/2024 10:30:18 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

“… With the investments being financed by tax increases, the inflationary impacts will be at most negligible—over the medium term outweighed by the supply side benefits…”

They have no clue how contradictory that ignorant state is.


37 posted on 04/25/2024 11:19:25 AM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Paid endorsements.


38 posted on 04/25/2024 12:19:24 PM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

17 fake winners turn out to be dumb as dirt


39 posted on 04/25/2024 1:06:52 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
I think Hayek was dead on when he said, "... the Nobel Prize confers on an individual an authority which in economics no man ought to possess." As long as economics maintains a positivist methodology but has incomparably - literally, incomparably - poor methods for experimentation and therefore affirmation or rejection of theories, economists are going to be wrong. Often, and badly, if history is to be trusted. I can't say it better than him so I will quote that same speech further: "This does not matter in the natural sciences. Here the influence exercised by an individual is chiefly an influence on his fellow experts; and they will soon cut him down to size if he exceeds his competence. But the influence of the economist that mainly matters is an influence over laymen: politicians, journalists, civil servants and the public generally. There is no reason why a man who has made a distinctive contribution to economic science should be omnicompetent on all problems of society – as the press tends to treat him till in the end he may himself be persuaded to believe."

From a Quora poster

40 posted on 04/25/2024 1:10:06 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson