We don’t need theories and conjecture. The Hawaii DOH in its official capacity has told us there is no valid BC for Obama in HI, when they sent 3 letters of “verification” that were not certified and thus legally useless. The only lawful reason to NOT give a certified verification is if they CAN’T because they have no valid BC there.
That’s not speculation. That is fact. We already have legal confirmation that Obama has no HI BC.
Why do most people in the country believe the opposite and even ridicule those who give the facts?
That’s what I’m asking you.
Why does the country believe a lie when we have legal confirmation of the truth?
Where do I find legal confirmation from the HI DOH that there is no valid BC for Obama in HI? Three letters of “verification “ that were not certified is not verification that they have no valid BC there, or confirmation of anything.
I don’t mean to ridicule anyone and don’t believe that I have done so. I do think we have different definitions of “facts”.
OK so I went to Hawaii Statues and read Section 338-14.3, which governs Letters of Verification issued in lieu of certified copies of birth/death/marriage certificates. I can see no requirement that the Letter of Verification be certified. The same requirements for the requestor apply.