Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/22/2024 10:32:26 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Freedom4US

dotcom era fuel cells? I think the statute of limitations on investent fraud has long since run out on those.


2 posted on 04/22/2024 10:33:42 AM PDT by xoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

Home fuel cell system ran from around $35,000 to $100,000 or more , ran ? so are they gone now ? LOL


5 posted on 04/22/2024 10:38:51 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US
IMHO the demise of fuel cells being a somewhat regular feature is because battery storage became cheaper, more compact, and more efficient.

For example, last year my home solar stored a total of 12,066.7 kWh (12 megawatt hours) to the solar battery bank, and 10,880.5 kWh was pulled from the batteries at nights and rainy days. So, in other words, my batteries gave me back 90% of what I gave them.

I don't think the production of hydrogen, storing it (either as gas or compressed), then using it to produce power with fuel cells can provide anything close to 90% of the energy used to produce and store the hydrogen.

7 posted on 04/22/2024 10:40:55 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

HYZON hybrid trucks
https://www.hyzonfuelcell.com/vehicles/hyhd8-200kw

Toyota 2024 Mirai
https://www.toyota.com/mirai/


11 posted on 04/22/2024 10:45:42 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

The problem with fuel cells is that they would be a wonderful source of energy if there were abundant sources of elemental oxygen and hydrogen. Unfortunately, there are not. Plants do produce elemental oxygen, which will remain abundant in the air until anti “global-warming” CO2 depletion schemes are put into effect, at which point, plants will start dying off and will no longer produce oxygen. Hydrogen, on the other hand, must be separated from whatever other elements it is covalently bound to. This takes energy. The energy gained by the combination of H2 and O2 to form water (and other molecules) will always be less than the energy required to produce elemental H2.


15 posted on 04/22/2024 10:48:30 AM PDT by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

I’m not an engineer but the subject interests me. So take the following with a big block of salt...

I think their has been some discussions of vehicles with fuel cells. But, as I understand, there are some big problems with it that still need to be overcome before the technology could be safely delivered to the automobile industry. Such as keeping the two gases under the pressures needed.

Apollo 13 had a fuel cell failure that destroyed/mission-killed the service module. Imagine millions of cars on the road, knowing if there was a similar failure, the vechicle would be destroyed and could cause collateral damage to structures (a garage) or another vehicle (if it happened on a drive.

...Other FReepers will steer you right on this subject! :-)


17 posted on 04/22/2024 10:50:38 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

The basic issue is cost, and energy efficiency.

Electrolysis is approx 50 percent efficient, and currently costs $10 / kg.

More efficient H2 production is based on methane, so it just adds to greenhouse gases.

Since there isn’t enough renewable electricity supply, you have to run natural gas generators to generate electricity to power generators for H2 ...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236122001867


18 posted on 04/22/2024 10:51:42 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US
Regarding the efficiency and efficacy of Fuel Cells:

The Laws of Thermodynamics Must be Followed

For further explanation, see β€œenergy vector transition”

21 posted on 04/22/2024 10:55:07 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

later


22 posted on 04/22/2024 10:58:42 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

Same thing that happened to flying cars. 🀑


24 posted on 04/22/2024 10:59:26 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β–ˆβ–ˆ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β–ˆ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

The effluent from fuel cells is dihydrogen monoxide, a dangerous gas that contributes the most to climate change.


25 posted on 04/22/2024 11:01:13 AM PDT by nesnah (Infringe - act so as to limit or undermine [something]; encroach on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US
Micro Fuel Cells were going to be "the next big thing" for powering your electronics. I interviewed with a startup company commercializing them (didn't get the job). You'd have a small cartridge of methanol fuel that you would plug in. No recharging -- just swap out the spent fuel cartridge for a new one. That fizzled.

Micro Fuel Cells: A Novel Breakthrough in Portable Power
By Smita Shukla
March 31, 2013

26 posted on 04/22/2024 11:05:55 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (β€œWhen exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward SnowdenA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

Oh, the humanity!

27 posted on 04/22/2024 11:07:06 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

It’s not ‘dead’ at all. At least for where it makes sense - which is Class 8 trucks. The loads they’re required to pull is not well suited for EV solutions on batteries alone. They’re too heavy and limited in range, requiring far too long a recharge cycle.

Hydrogen fuel cells make an interesting technology intersection in this space. Toyota and PACCAR are still working on them (which is public). There’s other, less public, things I’m aware of.

https://pressroom.toyota.com/paccar-and-toyota-expand-hydrogen-fuel-cell-truck-collaboration-to-include-commercialization/


29 posted on 04/22/2024 11:09:36 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

https://wattfuelcell.com/

https://www.imarineusa.com/Efoy151-000-210.aspx?gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhLvv8bXWhQMVfRCtBh00kgpGEAQYASABEgJzVPD_BwE (alcohol, marine rated)

sells RV/boat fuel cells. Off the shelf.

Google is your friend, if you bother to use it.


31 posted on 04/22/2024 11:12:49 AM PDT by ASOC (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

Government subsidies ended and the business gave up. They just don’t work in any practical sense. The ones I worked on were methanol based. Worked in a lab setting. But too hot, too cold, too anything, they didn’t work. Not sure how the NASA ones worked. But they would have been planned and proved to the gram of fuel.

As for off grid RV... Stick with a trusty old style absorption system. My friend had the Dometic 12v compressor and it had nothing but problems with the control electronics. There’s nothing to break on absorption units other than the occasional clogged orifice.


33 posted on 04/22/2024 11:13:07 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

I’m not going to a DC fridge for the reason you give, but I sure wish someone other than those European pricks Dometic would make a decent one. They quoted me over $1000 for the controller module I’m replacing today, which I finally got for a bit over $200 but had to ask a buddy in the UK to put and re-ship it as the distributor evidently had never heard of international shipping. Pisses me off to be at the mercy of some outfit that owns the market but doesn’t give a damn about service after the sale.


34 posted on 04/22/2024 11:17:26 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

There several kinds of “ Fuel Cells” out there. Fuel cell is a generic term. Race cars have a fuel cell that is basically a fuel tank. You can use hydrogen and air to run an internal combustion engine but why? You can use dc electrical current to produce hydrogen and water in a fuel cell. I would use propane as there are propane or 12 volt absorption refrigerators and propane generators.


38 posted on 04/22/2024 11:44:58 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

Thirty years ago there was a flurry of excitement about fuel cells. Plug Power was supposed to be an up and coming player. Its stock was about 5 dollars iirc, so I bought some.. Sold later in the year, as they didn’t perform much. Today they are 2.50.


41 posted on 04/22/2024 12:27:12 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom4US

I have an invention I call “Densified Hydrogen” that solves the fuel cell problems. What you do is bond hydrogen to long chains of carbon and it will turn into an energy dense room temperature liquid. Genius.


43 posted on 04/22/2024 1:11:22 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson