Yeah, I know it's from 11/2023, but the pathetic attempt at reinforcing defective Egyptology is being recycled by MSN and I noted that it was never posted here.
I classify such studies which egregiously deviate from the scientific method as fraudulent.
Anyone reading this who doesn't understand why I'm classifying this as 'fraud' should do your own due diligence as to the true age of the Sphinx (and particularly the enclosure, as well as research which cites the water erosion of both the statue and the enclosure).
This article is nothing but clap trap horseshit. I have seen the thing. It was not formed by erosion. Who are these imposters? Post kindergarten studies scholars?
In before the “It was Aliens” guy with weird hair!
This is old news to anyone who grew up listening to Art Bell...
Hold up now...
It is pretty easy to tell they took advantage of preexisting geological strata and then set a head on top after the preexisting strata was carved out to shape. The only question is “when”.
Lol. Erosion. What claptrap.
The idea that ancient stone masons did it with copper or stone tools is just as ridiculous.
I went to the site to see if they had any examples of yardangs that look like animals. They had a link to this:
https://www.jpost.com/national-news/egypt-comes-to-israel-sphinx-found-in-north-319346
That doesn’t look natural to me either.
Do people remember that NY university is full of American hating professors and students? I would not trust anything they came up with.
It’s ridiculous to claim it was formed by wind erosion.
Just imagine for a moment. The same people that don’t believe in Jesus now believes that the Great Sphinx was carved by accident by a bunch of random sand particles. AMAZING!
Hmmm...
Scratch that trip to Egypt from my bucket list...
Yeah-and Mount Rushmore was a natural formation, too!
EVERYONE knows these were ordered online and delivered by Amazon .
It sure doesn’t look like it comes from a ‘single’ rock.