The delivery driver was not inside her home.
This appears to be the fault of the dog's owner. The dog's owner was not in control of their dog.
Who leaves their dog outside their house in an unfenced yard, unsupervised and then acts surprised when unexpected and tragic events follow?
Given the facts as we know them, yes.
You are too quick to label all of this her fault.
You have put forth a snap judgement that I see as ill considered.
While all of your criticism of her may be true (we don't know yet), it does not exonerate a man who pulled out a gun and shot an animal that has not been demonstrated to have been dangerous.
The legal system uses a concept called the "reasonable man" standard. Would a reasonable man just shoot a dog that had not actually attacked him?
I don't believe any "reasonable man" would do such a thing.
Also, is it possible this man is a Muslim and is motivated by the well known Muslim hatred for dogs? Is this in fact a hate crime perpetrated by religious extremism?
As I said, I think you are too quick to blame the woman and you haven't given enough consideration to the entire picture.
So, her dog was uncontrolled, outside, not on a leash or behind a fence.
The delivery driver was not inside her home.
This appears to be the fault of the dog’s owner. The dog’s owner was not in control of their dog.
~~~~
This. You don’t have to get bitten to have the right to defend yourself against a threat.
Law and Order my ear.
She is fortunate that the delivery man was not injured.
Her explanation of expectations (Instacart order and events (e.g., ring camera charging) don’t really make sense.
The story said it was a small dog.