Posted on 03/16/2024 8:40:05 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
No doubt many times that would die from starvation and disease in the following months and years.
We are bumbling into a nuclear holocaust and you are beating the drums of war like a drunken monkey. You and your fellow travelers are bloody-minded mental midgets.
The front line keeps marching West fyi.
Ukraine's losses:
$60bn of US funding for Ukraine€50bn of EU funding for Ukraine
But United States might actually improve if big cities here are vaporized.
But United States might actually improve if big cities here are vaporized.
This “threat” tells Russia not to use a tactical nuke, but go ahead and wipe out the US with strategic nukes.
Fortunately for us, the Russian targeting put in place for US cities 40 years ago would now result in some beneficial urban renewal, as well as national destruction. Maybe every cloud has a silver lining?
This whole Ukraine/Russia conflict can be summed up in one word: reckless.
Reckless talk. Reckless actions.
By who? By every leader on each side. It’s just like WW1, but on a smaller scale. I believe Trump could sort this out. He might be the only one who can.
If China is not involved in such an exchange, they would be in charge of the world at that point.
A former Air Force officer came up with this?
So what?
The Russians haven’t already contemplated this?
We should be running simulations of what this country would be like without a thieving, lying, cheating, bullying Democrat party.
yes
Fulton County
Hiroshima probably saved several million Japanese from death by starvation.
If Russia launches China eats our nukes too.
Putin is of the same mindset as a jilted lover who kills his girlfriend so that nobody else can have her, and then kills himself.
Putin wants his way in Ukraine, or he’s going to take out the U.S. and Europe and his own country.
The question is what kind of attack on one of the NATO nations would be enough to trigger a nuclear exchange with Russia? Would use of a tactical nuke against Poland or Romania be worth that kind of risk (i.e., all out nuclear war)? Not saying its OK, just thinking about the proportionality and what it would take to justify thousands of nukes being launched — and the global consequences thereof.
LOL! Its perma-corrupt so nothing would change there.
Yup, China too…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.