Secret clauses in the Constitution!

American Thinker ^ | 7 Mar, 2024 | Robert Arvay

[MtnClimber]

You probably did not know that the Constitution contains a “Good and Plenty” clause. Well, according to the late Representative John Conyers (D-Mich.), it is one of several clauses in the document that permits the federal government to force you to buy health insurance. It is one of those “secret” clauses that were written into the Constitution in invisible ink, and which only woke leftists can see.

There are good and plenty of such clauses.

Recently, Stu Burguiere (producer of, and participant in, The Glenn Beck Program), during a Megyn Kelly podcast, laughingly pointed to another such hitherto unknown clause, which may be termed the “Should Be” clause. It is cited by some Democrats in supporting the now overturned decision of the Colorado Supreme Court to (in my view) snatch ballots out of the hands of the voters and place them in the hands of judges, who obviously know better than we do, as to who our rulers (always Democrats) “should be.” Judges “should be” allowed to decide for whom we are allowed to vote, as long as they decide we must vote for Democrats. It’s obvious!

Although it does not always take the form of a clause, Democrats have long cited the same underlying principle whenever they deem that it would serve the Republic, defined as the Democrat party. For example, in previous years, they decided that President Trump “should be” (1) required to take a cognitive ability test, which undoubtedly “should” (2) disqualify him from the presidency. He took it. It didn’t. He aced it.

But now that Biden is the occupant of the Oval Office, there is an exception to the “Should Be” clause, which says that Joe Biden “Should Not Be” required to take the same test, because even though it is clear...

[cuz1961]

More lies form Representative John Conyers, and the

Rrr-Democracy Pirate Party