Posted on 02/21/2024 10:56:57 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Thomas Haviland joins Alex Joins to give his expert analysis of the data behind new blood clots found in the bodies of the deceased.
Summary: Embalmers started seeing the clots in 2021 right after the release of the clot shots. Without exception, the new clots are in the "vaccinated."
Can’t be posted enough. People need to be aware of this.
“reeks of disinformation”
So when did you suddenly start using Marxist, DeepState terminology?
Do you still think Hunter’s laptop is “Russian disinformation?”
Hint: the video is quite careful to describe and/or show, regular post-mortem clots and to distinguish them from these large, white, novel “clots”...did you bother to watch the video?
What’s in a name or definition if it kills you?
exnavy wrote: “So, you got vaxxed?”
DiogenesLamp wrote: “Do you own stock in Pfizer or something?”
A Formerly Proud Canadian wrote: “You best make sure you are up to date on your ‘safe and effective’ shots and boosters.”
And, not one of you made an attempt to refute the links I posted. Relying instead upon ad hominem attacks.
This subject is like a circular firing squad, around here.
Do I need to watch the video? Isn’t the cover picture enough?
Your question about Hunter’s laptop is like, “Have you stopped beating your wife?” I never believed Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation. It was more like a crack-head forgetting where his stuff was.
I believe people are dying from this fake “vax” that isn’t a vaccine. I believe that the virus, the mRNA and the testing all came out of the same lab. I believe that this development is “Marek’s Disease” for humans and gives the elites a thrill up their leg. Its work pre-dates Trump, so it was going to be used, anyway.
Apparently, this isn’t enough. I have to watch the alien autopsy video and “Want To Believe”.
You’re next. Best be right with Jesus about now.
Your retort missed my point which was simply this.
The people who made the video were careful to describe normal postmortem clots.
The new clots
a) are different from normal postmortem clots — the video came from embalmers/mortician, so this is stuff they’re used to
b) only started showing up after the jabs
Dr. DOOGIE HOWITZER!
.
Chilly under Your Rock ?
Dr.Gas Bag is Missing as well...
More ‘Died Suddenly’
See, now YOU I believe. What you just said makes sense. YouTube videos, I find, are single-digits in terms of percentage of utility of time. Most people seem to just like to have the camera on them and will spend 90% of the video hyping what they are going to tell you.
Clearly, the real information is in living people. As I suspected, clotting occurs naturally after death, so some of this could be subjective. But the living have damaged hearts and arteries, probably causing this.
By the way, to be clear, when I spoke earlier of disinformation, I meant that the entirety of what is out there PROMOTING this “vax” is disinformation. The fear-porn about COVID is disinformation. The same people made both.
There are multiplier videos of the embalmers pulling out fibrous tissues but let's tell people to ignore what their lying eyes just saw.
“New Form Of Blood Clots Found In 50% Of The Dead...”
Probably because of all the drugs they used back then. By the way Jerry Garcia was not available for comment.
Three more personal attacks with not even a feeble attempt to refute the links I provided.
I sure do miss Dr. Gasbag, (alleged Dr.) Kozak, and DugwayDuke posting frantically on the benefits of clot shots. Soros must’ve figured out he was wasting money supporting those guys or bots or whatever they were.
They’ve piped down dramatically.
Doogie is still a shill with his mindless
Mudslinging. I’ve never heard anything that is Not an attack or smoke screen.
A True ONE TRICK PONY.
Probably on a 6th Booster!
Yeah, um, no.
Let's see you refute videos of morticians removing clots from dead bodies.
Folks are onto your nonsense.
“And, not one of you made an attempt to refute the links I posted.”
You quoted a Wikipedia entry, which are by nature often self-refuting.
Case in point is the snippet that you quoted: calling something “misinformation” or “debunked” without adequate citation means that the author is giving their opinion rather than the facts. At best it points to intellectual laziness on the part of both the author and, well, you.
I don’t say that to be mean; but rather to let you know that, if you are here at FR to change minds, you need to bring your “A” game.
Why would I waste my time on that? I could tell by what they said they were propaganda.
No, the weird growths have *NOT* been "debunked."
Best information I have on what they are is this explanation from Technogeeb.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4218342/posts?page=36#36
Excellent information. Educate yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.