Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

"Baldwin claimed the gun discharged when he took it out of the holster and denied firing it"

NOPE......TRY AGAIN

1 posted on 02/21/2024 5:53:09 AM PST by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: V_TWIN

any one of us would have been in jail a year ago...


2 posted on 02/21/2024 5:56:07 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

oh,, the lies that liars lie about !


3 posted on 02/21/2024 5:57:18 AM PST by Ikeon (Why is it acceptable to be a fool but, wrong to point it out? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

oh,, the lies that liars lie about !


4 posted on 02/21/2024 5:57:50 AM PST by Ikeon (Why is it acceptable to be a fool but, wrong to point it out? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

This trial is for the ARMORER. Not Baldwin.

The ARMORER is responsible for the care and loading of the weapon. The armorer loaded the gun with live ammunition. Not Baldwin. He only pulled the trigger.

As much as we all HAT Alec Baldwin because of his past actions, he is somewhat of a victim here(as the actor who fired the weapon). NOT as the producer of the movie. He is guilty for that. His trial comes after this.

Consider yourself as an ACTOR in Baldwin’s position. He is on set, the director calls for everyone to take their places. He is handed a weapon, which he assumes is filled with blanks by the ARMORER. The director calls for action, the ACTOR points the gun in the direction of the camera and pulls the trigger. He sees the woman standing next to the camera getting shot.

This is when the lying starts because Baldwin as the producer KNOWS that he is LIBEL for everything taking place on his movie set. He is screwed. So, he comes up with a story that he did not pull the trigger. When everyone knows that is impossible.

Verdict: Second Degree Manslaughter for the Armorer. 2-4 years in a minimum security NM prison.

She will then testify AGAINST Baldwin in both his criminal trial AND the CIVIL trial that will potentially BANKRUPT him .


6 posted on 02/21/2024 6:36:38 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

She is an admitted stoner, partying the night before, I guess when “anything goes” with these Hollywood types, anything can happen, it it might not be good.


7 posted on 02/21/2024 6:41:50 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

I read some civil complaints which painted a pretty ugly picture of the production and safety standards. Granted it was all plaintiff accusations but multiple complaints all made similar accusations.

If provable my take is the armorer was criminally negligent (she knew there was live ammo on set, and that the pistol was being used for recreational target practice) and that Baldwin should be civilly liable at the end. I would think that his personal actions were malicious (lies and cover-up) and would allow corporate protections of his production company to be breached to reach his personal assets.


16 posted on 02/21/2024 7:45:45 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

The crew was using the gun for “plinking”. Though 45LC ammo is kind of expensive for plinking. The pistol should have been locked up and no live ammo allowed on site, period. There is incompetence all around this mess.


18 posted on 02/21/2024 8:11:50 AM PST by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson