I read some civil complaints which painted a pretty ugly picture of the production and safety standards. Granted it was all plaintiff accusations but multiple complaints all made similar accusations.
If provable my take is the armorer was criminally negligent (she knew there was live ammo on set, and that the pistol was being used for recreational target practice) and that Baldwin should be civilly liable at the end. I would think that his personal actions were malicious (lies and cover-up) and would allow corporate protections of his production company to be breached to reach his personal assets.
Baldwin is sticking with the narrative that the gun went off but he didn’t pull the trigger......that dog won’t hunt.