Posted on 02/16/2024 4:57:39 AM PST by MtnClimber
My neighborhood is changing. In just the six years that we have lived in our suburb after fleeing St. Louis, Missouri for a more conservative area that supports our conservative values, towering apartment buildings are being built everywhere. There have been dozens of new car washes, chain restaurants, and big businesses put in or approved.
During 2020, panhandlers started appearing in the area. This has grown so common that the local government had to recently pass a bill outlawing it for the safety of pedestrians and drivers because the panhandlers were obstructing traffic.
While conservative Americans have continuously expressed outrage at political movements that seek to urbanize suburban areas, uni-party elitists in Washington have pressed to globalize every aspect of our lives.
Now, I believe that these officials do deserve plenty of blame, but unfortunately, local officials are a driving force behind this modern crusade to turn every area into a city — complete with liquor stores on every corner.
I report for my local paper. It is run by a former writer for the St. Louis Post Dispatch. She left that “prestigious” paper when they went corporate years ago.
Writing for a locally owned paper and reporting on my local beats was supposed to be a nice change of pace from my other political writing job, but after months of attending Board of Aldermen meetings, I’ve learned that, just like everything else, all of this starts closer to home.
I have three beats. One is my municipality, which I love. The mayor and board all get along and pass pretty much everything that is proposed with little to no opposition. It seems very kosher, but that is because virtually none of our 60,000 residents in my suburb attend the meetings.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’ve seen density pushed because developers told the local politicians it was needed to bring the businesses they want.
What usually happens is that the density comes and the business never does.
The easiest way around that is to structure the zoning code so that mixed-use buildings with ground floor commercial space and residential units above is given favorable treatment over stand-alone apartment buildings.
Well yeah. That’s just the natural math of a growing city. Out of town becomes the ex-urbs, ex-urbs become suburbs, and suburbs become urbs. Not really a mystery. At the end of the 19th century the part of Tucson I live in was a different township entirely with a bunch of nothing between it and Tucson. By the time I got here it was all Tucson.
Yogi, how have you been?
How about a bounty on panhandlers who disrupt traffic?
Maybe that's because we complain, bitch and moan instead of DEMAND!
Cyclopean clusters of Chinese style tofu-dreg apartments for everyone!
“...tax revenue stream while adding no students to the public school system...”
Well how’s that gonna work with all our new ‘citizens’?
My County is one of the Redest in Minnesota.
Over the last 5 years... They’ve built multiple high density housing projects and put in dozens of business complexes where there used to be farm land...
My taxes have skyrockets accordingly...
Anecdotal proof... but there it is...
Sure. Then the ground floor remains empty for years. Real world experience with this.
Everyday citizens running for office rather than just those with a leftwing agenda needs to happen more often. Until recently it’s been the norm. George Soros with his ‘hand picked’ culture disruptors is still the exception not the rule. Does that answer your question?
Lots of things didn’t exist yet in the late 1800s
I’ve seen that in newer multiple buildings in the Manasses Virginia area. Empty business spaces unclaimed at the ground level and apartments on top.
Have you witnessed that sort of dreary prison-block style housing projects going up in our part of the country (between Cascades and Rockies)? I haven’t. In my town there are numerous apartment developments going up but in the typical three-story style with courtyards, pools, etc. Often with tasteful color schemes and distinctive.
True, but the concept of how cities grow did. Heck Euclid complained about urban sprawl. Even with skyscrapers cities will still grow horizontally more than vertically. So you’re nice suburb now will be in the city in 10 to 20 years.
If she doesn’t want any development (big box stores and restaurants) she needs to move to a mountain hamlet where there is no physical space for development.
Local politicians perform much better when angry and determined locals are in their face 24/7.
They are public servants and need to be treated like servants.
If they don’t like it they are free to quit.
But she probably won’t find that in Missouri lol!
News flash:
This has been going on for at least 60 years, and there are any number of suburban ghettos which prove it. They all started off nice, then they went to hell. Many close-in suburbs were well underway on that dismal journey before many of us were even born, and things surely aren’t getting any better today.
You want a good area? Get as far away from the central city as possible. Skip over the “first ring” suburbs (they should be obviously horrible by now) and probably over the second ring too. In some areas like Atlanta, you need to go at least 3-4 counties away from Fulton. That’s a hell of a commute if you work in the city, but well worth it to be able to sleep relatively safely at night.
“Suburban sprawl needs to end … the day after MY FAMILY moves into OUR suburban town.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.