Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot; Leaning Right; elpadre; DiogenesLamp
Well, you certainly can refer to cases than have failed to reach the court's attention for a variety of reasons, but the precedent you refer to is no more than, "Don't expect the court to accept your petition if it is procedurally flawed".

A petition that is procedurally flawed? My FRiend, Upthread I posted a link that shows, for Obama alone, 226 petitions that failed to even be considered. You think they are all procedurally flawed? That thousands of great legal minds over several years of diligent efforts put together petitions that are procedurally flawed?

Get real.

Most importantly, if nothing more than mere citizenship was required, as clearly is the current proposition, then there would be no need at all for the founders to add any reference to "natural born citizen".

There was a specific reason why the founders declined to identify and describe what exactly an NBC is. Do you know why? I do. So do thousands of legal experts and historians. And what we all know is that Obama, Kamala, Ted Cruz, John McCain, Vivek, Cleveland, Nikki and yes even Donald Trump are all eligible to serve as they are (or were) citizens.

Look. There are plenty of reasons to want Nikki to fail. We heard these same lame arguments against Ted Cruz, only so so loudly vocal since he was less hated than Obama or Nikki. But to grandstand on this issue as you people do only shows racism and hypocracy.

Stop it.

120 posted on 01/20/2024 9:39:29 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd
There was a specific reason why the founders declined to identify and describe what exactly an NBC is. Do you know why? I do.

There is no rational basis for you to claim the founders "declined to identify and to describe the term" or even that there was a need to do so. It is certain they were confident of their usage of the term, that it was well understood at the time at least by those who would sign the document and thought appropriate.

However, this would be a good time for you to explain why you believe they seemed to purposely obscure the meaning of the term since you claim to know.

As for the rest of your response you mistakenly confuse me for an anti-Nikki voter and charge me and others for grandstanding on the NBC issue only because we are racists.

With that, I am going to do things more enjoyable than exchanging with you.

124 posted on 01/20/2024 11:42:58 AM PST by frog in a pot (In reality it was a successful Dem coup obtained via a stolen election accepted on Jan6 by Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
My FRiend, Upthread I posted a link that shows, for Obama alone, 226 petitions that failed to even be considered.

Yup. Idiot arrogant Judges that needed to be dragged out in the street and horsewhipped for being jackasses.

Dysfunctional courts. Completely dysfunctional. Broken.

There was a specific reason why the founders declined to identify and describe what exactly an NBC is. Do you know why?

Yes, because they all knew what it meant at the time, because they had all read Vattel.

They tossed out English common law regarding "subjects" when they tossed out "subjects" and replaced it with "citizens."

139 posted on 01/20/2024 1:00:04 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson