Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/13/2024 10:06:59 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

PING!................


2 posted on 01/13/2024 10:07:16 PM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Back when CO2 was seven times higher than it is now trees grew like weeds.


3 posted on 01/13/2024 10:13:02 PM PST by TigersEye (Our Republic is under seige by globalist Marxists. Hold fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Boy, this is fascinating!

You’re on a roll tonight RB!


5 posted on 01/13/2024 10:22:34 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Amazing that it was “just discovered” in NY. I’d expect such a rare mystery would be discovered in an area with little population..


7 posted on 01/13/2024 10:28:19 PM PST by Veto! (FJB Sucks Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The main problem with claiming that there is such a thing as a 385M year old forest on Earth is that the people making that claim (and/or claiming that our planet is 4B years old...) are the same people who still claim (despite all the new soft tissue evidence and the 20K - 40K radiocarabon dates for some of that soft tissue) that dinosaurs died out 65M years ago. Extrapolating from the soft tissue evidence indicates that our planet is more like 500K - 5M years old.

Obviously, no forest on earth is any older than that.

8 posted on 01/13/2024 10:34:19 PM PST by ganeemead (everything )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m no botanist, but I’m pretty sure there was forest on earth more than 385 million years ago.


9 posted on 01/13/2024 10:42:53 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Is it coal?


10 posted on 01/13/2024 10:42:59 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Ancient is the wrong word. It should be properly called primordial or primeval.


14 posted on 01/13/2024 11:47:05 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

My late father, after getting out of farming, took a job at a granite quarry in North Carolina. One day he brought home some rocks that had fossilized plants. They looked like ancient ferns. I was twelve and was eager to show my teacher the next day. She thought it was pretty cool.


15 posted on 01/14/2024 12:35:39 AM PST by Ciaphas Cain (Dear Claire Wolfe: Is it still "too early"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

16 posted on 01/14/2024 1:39:49 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Can you still burn trees that are embedded in rocks?

What would a violin made from this wood sound like?

They could be called Fossilvarious.


19 posted on 01/14/2024 5:24:04 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

AND a road! Wait... maybe that’s a dinosaur trail.


20 posted on 01/14/2024 5:25:42 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“As trees developed these roots, they played a crucial role in extracting carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, sequestering it and triggering a significant transformation in the planet’s climate, ultimately shaping the atmosphere we experience today.”

I thought that grasslands produced more Oxygen - which means they take more CO2 from the atmosphere. But they couldn’t help themselves.


22 posted on 01/14/2024 6:25:23 AM PST by trebb (So many fools - so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

—— the Amazon rainforest ——

Is not Ancient.

The Amazon rain forest has grown up covering untold square miles of former human habitation. The Amazon Rain Forest is only thousands of years old.


23 posted on 01/14/2024 6:31:21 AM PST by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Hamasci de is required in totalhe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Yes...and one of the fossil of the tree has a ‘Ugg loves Igh’ carved in the trunk... 🤓


24 posted on 01/14/2024 7:02:52 AM PST by Deplorable American1776 (Guns don't kill people, LIBERALS DO!! Support the Second Amendment...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m saying fake news. It’s more likely the area was covered by glaciers during a recent ice age.


25 posted on 01/14/2024 8:02:01 AM PST by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

They waited until the fifth sentence to slather on a thick layer of climate propaganda.


26 posted on 01/14/2024 9:50:46 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson