Posted on 01/07/2024 1:23:13 PM PST by nickcarraway
Vs how many saved?
Any treatment is going to have a number of deaths associated with it because not everybody will be compatible with that treatment.
I wonder which pharmaceutical company financed this study?
See, we can play that game too.
UTTER BS!!! The propaganda lately is thick!!!
“Yet the researchers say: “This result argues in favour of tightly regulating access to off-label prescriptions during future pandemics”.
That figures. That’s the whole purpose of this article.
Unexpected gain of function.
I do not believe this article. HCQ has been administered literally billions of times in the tropics for prevention of malaria. If this study were true we would have had millions of deaths in the tropics and a valid study on this would have been published. I took the drug when I worked in Nigeria. They are gaslighting us.
cpdiii retired clinical pharmacist
Show us PROOF! More likely there were 17,000 casualties among those to whom it was administered too late to help. It's been used for many decades to treat malaria without killing people.
That’s a lot of fish-tank cleaner!
Same drug that's been on the WHO's List of Essential Medicines for years and is sold over the counter in countries with prevalent malaria.
“HCQ use was associated with an 11 per cent increase in the mortality rate in a meta-analysis of randomised trials,” the study noted, citing a meta-analysis published in 2021 in Nature which the researchers used to calculate the number of deaths induced by the drug.
‘It’s not gone. It’s changing. It’s killing’: The COVID variants the WHO is watching closely The estimated number of deaths in European countries was roughly 240 in Belgium, 199 in France, 1,822 in Italy, and 1,895 in Spain.”
As a student of pharmacology I woul like to see it explained to me tge particular and exact mechanism in the HCQ tgat causes cardiac arrhythmia
They give amiodarome for instance to patients with arrhythmias not because a lot of Europeans have a reduction in arrhythmias after using amiodarone but because there is a particular mechanism in the substance that reduces arrhythmias of a particular type
For instance:
“ It blocks potassium currents that cause repolarization of the heart muscle during the third phase of the cardiac action potential. As a result amiodarone increases the duration of the action potential as well as the effective refractory period for cardiac cells (myocytes).”
You show me that statement in relation to the opposite effect from HCQ and I will read on
Until then this is just propaganda
This is a bogus conclusion, especially since the doses given trials that went bad were not what was recommended.
I can pick bad studies all day long for commonly used drug therapies, and claim them the truth, too.
TOTAL BULL SHIT!
“You vill believe do you understand!”
What a gigantic crock of bovine feces.
The antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, used in combination with zinc and azithromycin, was highly effective, but not necessarily so when used in isolation. Also, in many instances, the protocol was used far too late in the course of the disease, and was essentially useless after the cytokine storm has overtaken the immune system, causing massive organ failure.
Ventilators, touted early on as a heroic form of intervention, proved to be an accelerant is used too late as well.
My wife has been taking HCQ for decades for an autoimmune disease. During COVID, our pharmacy cut her off. We had to get this vital drug from alternative sources for a while.
I have the feeling that I am being BS’ed and gaslighted.
Now. these vile lying medical ‘experts’ have the audacity to blame one of the safest, most used therapudic drugs in history for causing Covid deaths. They have no shame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.