2020 Election Fraud and the Courts

American Thinker ^ | 22 Dec, 2023 | Mark J. Fitzgibbons

[MtnClimber]

While it’s far too late for the judicial worm to turn on illegalities in the 2020 election in a way that would overturn the election of President Biden, maybe there are other consequences to be had for the people who engineered what may be the most consequential criminal collaboration or conspiracy in history.

To quote the daily X post of @lsferguson:

Who gave the order to stop counting votes” in unprecedented lockstep, sending home election monitors, and increasing the opportunities for voter fraud is a prima facie basis to believe there was a criminal conspiracy in the 2020 election. But there is much more to create reasonable or probable cause for real investigations.

At that critical time following the election and preceding the events of January 6, 2021, the Trump campaign and others, including voters and state officials, were filing lawsuits in the respective states where voting illegalities, material irregularities, unconstitutional acts involving ballot distribution, and outright voter fraud occurred.

Those emergency lawsuits were hampered by the lack of opportunity to gather evidence through formal discovery.

One of the most publicized of the lawsuits was filed by Texas attorney general Ken Paxton challenging certification of electors in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

His Motion for Expedited Consideration filed on December 7, 2020 before the U.S. Supreme Court bit off an awful lot considering the lack of opportunity for discovery. Paxton nevertheless cited incidents in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin that had the cumulative effect of stealing the election nationally, but his case never reached the argument stage because the Supreme Court said he lacked standing.

Paxton’s case was based on Texans’ being “entitled to a presidential election in which the votes from each of the states are counted only if the ballots are cast and counted in a manner that...

[MtnClimber]

With all of the leftist judges I don’t see how any judicial measures will work.

[FlingWingFlyer]

The courts have joined with the far-left “media” to defend the friggin Dung Beetle Party and their thieving comrades.

[Alberta's Child]

In retrospect, the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the Texas case should be seen as the best thing that ever happened.

Once you get the Federal courts involved in that kind of dispute, you will inevitably have Federal oversight of the entire presidential election process and a mandatory national standard for all elections.

Get a clue, folks ... this doesn't mean the election process will be a secure and sound one. It means the laws of the state with the loosest, most ridiculous standards for voter eligibility, early/mail-in/endless voting, etc. will become the standard adopted for use across the entire country.

[cuz1961]

all these prog Judges,,,

takes the saying

” a gallery of rogues”

to all new heights.

[cuz1961]

, you will inevitably have

\/
.

your “ opinion stated as fact “

is like your prog lie hole....yours.

/-)

[delchiante]

Fedzilla was a co conspirator in the stealing of a Presidential election and installation of a puppet..

That screams for the Declaration of Independence..

And an obliteration of the Deep State that is Fedzilla

[Alberta's Child]

How do you have Federal courts adjudicating election disputes between states if you don't have a uniform standard that serves as the basis for a court decision?

The Texas lawsuit preposterous on its face. You had Texas claiming that other states didn't meet their legal standards for a presidential election ... while Texas itself also didn't meet its own legal standards for a presidential election.

[cuz1961]

stop farting in my direction.

i dont buy any of your assertions

your comments carry the same validity and weight as warm flatulence from Alberta /-)