Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Rhino

Well there is an argument one could make that a marriage that was about 4 hours old would not qualify one to take possession of the deceased’s estate. It wasn’t even consummated.


24 posted on 12/06/2023 10:24:14 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: gibsonguy

This has the potential to allow attorneys to keep it going until they are the ones who get the estate. Gotta love the legal (theft) system.


26 posted on 12/06/2023 10:28:13 AM PST by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gibsonguy

how do you know what they did in the golf cart before the accident? :)


45 posted on 12/06/2023 12:57:42 PM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gibsonguy
"Well there is an argument one could make that a marriage that was about 4 hours old would not qualify one to take possession of the deceased’s estate. It wasn’t even consummated."

Exactly. They weren't even married a whole day.

The NY Post article explains:

The bride was killed in the accident on April 28. Three days later, on May 1, while the groom was recovering in the hospital, his aunt and uncle brought the signed marriage license and certificate to a probate court and filled out forms. On one form, the aunt wrote that the bride and groom lived together after the marriage (which is a lie because the bride died at her wedding).

49 posted on 12/06/2023 8:18:20 PM PST by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson