Men Pretending To Be Women Go To Lunch With Man Pretending To Be Catholic

Babylon Bee ^ | Nov 22, 2023

[NWFree]

The trannys went to see Pope Fagalot

[rlmorel]

No, not at all! If I made a mistake, that is the second one I have done today, and not both of them here on FR!

[NorthMountain]

Wrong.

There is no objective definition of a "True Scotsman", to which a third party can refer.

The Catholic Faith, in its creed, dogmas, and doctrines, IS objectively (and extensively) defined. You don't have to like it. You don't have to agree with it. You don't even have to think it's "biblical". What you CAN'T do, honestly, is claim that nobody can knows what it really is.

And that's the problem with Mr. Bergoglio: he consistently contradicts things that anybody can see are well established, well documented, articles of the Catholic Faith.

[nitzy]

If you admin that the Catholic Church has EVER changed ANY of their creeds dogmas or doctrines, then you would admit that these things are changeable and are whatever the current administration says they are.

If the current Pope and Bishops want to allow or even require gay or transgender Priests, then that will be the new official position of the church.

Anyone disagreeing with that stance will no longer be Catholic.

[NorthMountain]

If you want to know what The Church teaches, you can find out. It just requires that you know how to read.

No, the “current administration” as you call it, doesn’t just get to make up new doctrines. Even less (if that is possible) does the “current administration” as you call it get to contradict established doctrine.

That, of course, is different from many other groups claiming to be Christian, in which teachings are literally a matter of debate at every annual meeting.

Your resort to the “No True Scotsman” fallacy merely reveals your ignorance.

[NorthMountain]

The long and short of it is that our friends at the Babylon Bee actually have the matter 100% correct: Bergoglio is merely pretending to be Catholic.

[nitzy]

So, the Catholic Church has never changed their creeds, dogma or doctrine over the past 1600 years?

Interesting….

I actually know your next line….

“They have never changed their doctrine, it has just been interpreted differently if it was initially being interpreted wrong.”

That’s the line isn’t it?

I just love hearing Catholics say that…

“We used to think X and now we think Y but we never changed. We just realized that we were interpreting it wrong so we now interpret it right.”

Hilarious.

[NorthMountain]

Hilarious

You describe yourself perfectly.

[daniel1212]

You would do well to restrict yourself to talking about protestantism. Your comments on Catholics and the Catholic Church are as far removed from reality as Bruce Jenner’s claim to be a woman.

Then you must substantiate your allegations - which I can.

[NorthMountain]

Then you must

No, I don't have to jump through hoops for you, boy.

I offered you friendly advice.

You can take it or leave it.

[NorthMountain]

BTW, are you and “nitzy” different people?

[daniel1212]

No, I don't have to jump through hoops for you, boy. I offered you friendly advice. You can take it or leave it.

Thanks for the compliment to a 71 year-old, but you made an allegation, and I actually want to know what you think I said was "as far removed from reality as Bruce Jenner’s claim to be a woman."

[daniel1212]

BTW, are you and “nitzy” different people?

Never heard of “nitzy,” and I have been here since 2007, by the grace of God.

[Elsie]

You make apparitions cry.

[Elsie]

Your resort to the “No True Scotsman” fallacy merely reveals your ignorance.

Written like a True Catholic.

Kudos; Brother!

--Catholic_Wannabe_Dude(Hail Mary!)

[Elsie]

Near the very end of the Book that Rome compiled so long ago, there are descriptions of seven different churches (Catholic; if you can accept the teaching of Rome) that sure seem to have followed differing doctrines taught, evidently, by early church fathers.

I've yet to see any explanation as to how this was even remotely possible.