Posted on 11/24/2023 2:15:34 PM PST by John S Mosby
Wondering if the Tech experts and election legal experts here on FR could suggest how to prevent supposedly "not connected to the internet" (which turned out to BE connected and transmitting to sat uplinks to Europe and, back. Per Trump's NYTimes numbers graphics broadcast showing coordination of time, and the millions of bytes of data- also tracked by US cyber sleuths in DOD).
Do this through State law, and funding requiring each precinct NOT be able to transmit or in some way be encrypted if transmitting so these actions can be foiled.
Reaching out for creative effective ideas, laws, regs. enforcement and poll watchers too. We don't win this we have a bunch of loonies continuing to be "elected" when they could not ever be in a normal world.
Maybe take this off line- don't give the jokers ANY info on how and what we know.
It was the norm.
Yup.
Dreamer. We don’t even arrest murderers.
Not for 250 years.
Print out multiple copies of the totals. Then send the printouts through multiple handlers tothe central collection location.
SHUT DOWN THE GRID, Hand count on paper ballots
How about everyone has to vote in person, with a paper ballot, and we have them dip their fingers in purple dye to make sure they don’t vote more than once? I think I’ve seen this before.
“By changing “digital votes” to paper ballots and requiring photo ID and signature verification.”
Votes are tabulated by precinct before sending the numbers to the state. Paper ballots and ID would have no effect on transmission of the results.
“Wondering if the Tech experts and election legal experts here on FR could suggest how to prevent supposedly “not connected to the internet” (which turned out to BE connected and transmitting to sat uplinks to Europe and, back. “
The voting machines were never connected to the internet. You are confusing that claim.
Precinct data was not sent to Europe.
Precinct data is sent to the state via secured methods.
“Just ban all electronic voting”
That would not effect the transmission of vote tallies to the state.
That’s fine. As long as you can trace it all back to valid paper ballots of documented provenance and have an audit trail.
Ballots of unknown provenance should not be counted.
How do you propose that vote tallies be transmitted to the state?
Hypothetically as one person at one poll location? Pop a spark gap generator at the site, and make sure surveillance cameras and other tech cannot catch you dropping it, as FCC No-Likey. You would have to hide it, so they could not find it. I am guessing if it surprised them, they would not be able to track it down in time to fix the problem. Indeed most might just attribute it all to come WiFi connection problems. But that would accomplish nothing nationwide.
The real answer is blow open the covert intel operation running America, by exposing the surveillance between now and then. If you could get the surveillance exposed and put it on its heels, I am not sure they could rig the election without that criminal surveillance operation’s overwatch.
People do not understand. The problem is not a handful of Democrat poll workers. It is a whole secret society of citizen informants with an organization based off the old East German Stasi, operating as a professional intelligence operation taking over the US.
With that operational, you will not stop the next election from being rigged.
“Ballots of unknown provenance should not be counted.”
Subject of thread is not about counting votes. It is about the integrity of the counts transmitted to the state.
Oh, it’s you. I thought I was talking to a real person and not a CCP AI Chatbot.
With all due respect, GFY.
“How about everyone has to vote in person, with a paper ballot, and we have them dip their fingers in purple dye to make sure they don’t vote more than once? I think I’ve seen this before.”
That would have zero effect on how the precinct results are transmitted to the state.
“Oh, it’s you. I thought I was talking to a real person and not a CCP AI Chatbot.
With all due respect, GFY.”
Keep your posts accurate and I won’t have to correct them.
GFY, CCP AI Chatbot.
Sounds like the bot admitted to being a chat bot! 🤣
I don’t see a denial!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.