[gas_dr]

He doesn’t like that very much when you consider actual facts. And many of these are “peer reviewed” by paying the journal to publish. The majority of this — as you adroitly point out — is garbage.

[grey_whiskers]

He doesn’t like that very much when you consider actual facts

He was quoting from the summary sections; not from the hard science.

Troll.

And many of these are “peer reviewed” by paying the journal to publish.

List the exact articles which are "peer reviewed" by paying the journal to publish.

We'll wait, troll-boi.

[Fury]

And many of these are “peer reviewed” by paying the journal to publish.

Yes - there was one such woodchuck that was running such a journal out of their house with a similar name as an established journal. Endemic of a larger issue.

It doesn't help that some peer reviewed journals have really lost their way and and push normative science. It's left a vacuum for less than reputable journals.

[exDemMom]

And many of these are “peer reviewed” by paying the journal to publish.

It is common for publishers to charge fees for submission, publication, or page charges. This is separate from peer review. Some of the most prominent journals, such as Nature, charge premium fees to authors.