He was quoting from the summary sections; not from the hard science.
Troll.
And many of these are “peer reviewed” by paying the journal to publish.
List the exact articles which are "peer reviewed" by paying the journal to publish.
We'll wait, troll-boi.
“He was quoting from the summary sections; not from the hard science.”
I quoted their conclusions based on their review of their hard science.
With all due respect, I have read almost every article you have presented over the last few years and they are crap. Also the “summary” or in science language the “abstract” details the findings of the publication and is standard in every scientific paper. Apparently even the pseudo-scientific garbage you presented herein.
On last little favor. Can you pick another insult beside troll. Vary it up a little. I would hate to think you are capable of only monosyllabic insults. Surely you can be more creative than that.