That was a hell of a read!
1 posted on
11/14/2023 6:14:02 AM PST by
Duke C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Duke C.
...officials involved in the effort tell Axios. So, they were not screened? lol
2 posted on
11/14/2023 6:16:03 AM PST by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(The kernel of our firm's job is to go with lots. - tnlibertarian job offer letter)
To: Duke C.
“Accuse your enemy of what it is you’re doing.” Alinsky.
L
3 posted on
11/14/2023 6:16:18 AM PST by
Lurker
( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is. )
To: Duke C.
Exactly what the RATs have been doing.
4 posted on
11/14/2023 6:18:00 AM PST by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: Duke C.
Good. Trump was surrounded by establishment traitors during his first admin. It will be good if he can hit the ground running. There are a lot of vermin to exterminate in the DC swamp.
To: Duke C.
Trump learned a lot in his first term. In every office lurk people who want him destroyed.
6 posted on
11/14/2023 6:23:12 AM PST by
lurk
(u)
To: Duke C.
Hundreds of people are spending tens of millions of dollars to install a pre-vetted, pro-Trump army of up to 54,000 loyalists across government
So there's a plan to replace the unelected bureaucrats in the federal departments under the Executive Branch with people who might actually do what the president wants? Not seeing the problem here.
The only concerns I'd have are where do they find 54,000 competent people with nothing better to do than work for the federal government, and can we be sure that federal job protections won't keep the current Biden loyalists in their jobs?
To: Duke C.
Average American has to have a criminal background check, drug test and a min of two interviews before being hired for low wage work, so yeah, vet the heck out of those who would advise Donald Trump, please.
8 posted on
11/14/2023 6:27:42 AM PST by
The Louiswu
(Pray for Peace in the world.)
To: Duke C.
So, a president who uses executive orders for the purpose of attacking and crippling the American economy and for limiting freedoms of American citizens is perfectly A-Okay with the Axios bunch.
But a president who would limit government controls on freedom is executing a power grab.
When I see bilge like this, I wonder if there is even a shred of self-awareness in these people.
Do they really have no issue with the elimination of free speech (which pertains to political expression)? And no issue with the attempts to keep us dependent on public transportation so that our ability to go outside of our homes is limited? How about the efforts to stop us from traveling? What about the efforts to ban all gas appliances and force us all to use (vastly more expensive) electric ones? Or the efforts to force us all into rationed government controlled health care?
I’ll go with the freedom president, even if that means he’s going to grab power... by pushing back government to something that is less intrusive on our lives.
9 posted on
11/14/2023 6:31:16 AM PST by
exDemMom
(Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
To: Duke C.
You’d think the dumb authors of the article actually believe that folks like Myorkas and not the White House are in charge of the border policies. What it is that they really believe is that federal agencies are unbiased and “independent”. LOL
10 posted on
11/14/2023 6:38:42 AM PST by
Wuli
( ,)
To: Duke C.
“Everyone I don’t like is Hitler!”
To: Duke C.
Will he have as many czars as Obama had for his fundamentally changing the United States of America?
12 posted on
11/14/2023 6:47:49 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Duke C.
Yes it was ,here’s hoping it comes to pass! This would be FANTASTIC!
To: Duke C.
Why it matters: Does this kind of thing in supposed "news" articles strike anybody else as being manipulative and arrogant?
14 posted on
11/14/2023 7:01:48 AM PST by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: Duke C.
15 posted on
11/14/2023 7:06:15 AM PST by
wafflehouse
("there was a third possibility that we hadn't even counted upon" -Alice's Restaurant Massacree)
To: Duke C.
This is the deep state preparing for its own survival. Nothing scares them more than a Trump presidency.
17 posted on
11/14/2023 7:09:47 AM PST by
Spok
(It takes a lot of learning to understand how little we know. (Paraphrasing Thomas Sowell.))
To: Duke C.
cuz ya know
the biden administration
is just chock full of MAGA
18 posted on
11/14/2023 7:10:15 AM PST by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: Duke C.
“as part of an unprecedented operation to centralize and expand his power”
So “unprecedented” now means “something that every incoming President does (if he is smart)”?
To: Duke C.
Axios makes this sound like a bad thing.
I say “Bring It On.”
21 posted on
11/14/2023 7:40:24 AM PST by
FroggyTheGremlim
(Plunk your magic twanger, Froggy!)
To: Duke C.
Kinda what the Dems have done for years. Let’s roll!
22 posted on
11/14/2023 8:45:16 AM PST by
jimfree
(My 21 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: Duke C.
Democrat Kiddie Rapers are lying scum.
24 posted on
11/14/2023 9:14:54 AM PST by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson