And yet it seems that you can't admit, that the jabs, which introduce the modified mRNA directly into the blood -- muscle tissue is highly perfused-- (which means, unless it is all absorbed into other tissue before the circulation carries it into the heart, it gets exposed to the heart) -- and clinically, the spike protein has been shown by Pfizer's internal documents ("admission against interest" and not invented or twisted by an outsider) to spread throughout the body-- that means the spike protein from the jabs, which is designed to bind to the same ACE-2 receptors as the real gain-of-function engineered virus. Which means if he is seeing the heart damage from those who have received the jabs, he IS qualified (at literally a world-class level) to discuss it.
The ONLY possible hope you have to impeach him, is to show that he had anecdotal reports of symptoms, did no diagnostics, and then jumped to the conclusion that "well it must have been the dratted clot shots") and lashed out.
But he might've, you know, as an MD, had his nurse take a clinic history and just asked the patients if they've been jabbed.
Dingbat.
Why do you distrust science so much? I sense that you do not understand the scientific process and you do not have even a high school level of understanding of science.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (whew!)
Trust me on this, you do NOT want to go there.
Cretin.
Please, are you unable to understand the sequence of events following vaccination?
I've explained it before.
At this point, it is up to YOU to explain why mRNA encoding spike protein in a vaccine is life-threateningly dangerous, but mRNA encoding spike protein in a SARS-CoV-2 virus is harmless and nothing to worry about. YOU have to provide the scientific references from the scientific/medical literature. YOU have to explain how and why SARS-CoV-2 virus particles which are literally covered with spike protein and distributed all over your body are innocuous.
which is designed to bind to the same ACE-2 receptors as the real gain-of-function engineered virus
And it is up to YOU to explain how and why this virus was supposedly engineered and what, specifically, the "gain-of-function" allegedly is. If there is any scientific evidence, it should be fairly straightforward to find at PubMed.gov. I'll point out that if there was any proof of virus bioengineering, every scientist in the world would have raced to be first to publish.
I do find it ironic that the conspiracy theorists who push the antivax narrative that vaccines are dangerous, blah blah blah, also claim that Covid-19 is just a mild little cold that is caused by an engineered bioweapon designed to wipe out humanity. Which is it? A deadly bioweapon or a harmless little cold?
But he might've, you know, as an MD, had his nurse take a clinic history and just asked the patients if they've been jabbed.
Let's see. I assume you are referring to Peter McCullough.
Here, look at this. Autoimmune inflammatory reactions triggered by the COVID-19 genetic vaccines in terminally differentiated tissues.
This review (not study report), which was written to imply that there are dangers with the vaccine that everyone is overlooking, lists Peter McCullough as the last author. He listed his professional affiliation as "Cardiology, Truth for Health Foundation, Tucson, AZ, USA."
Whoa, wait one minute. Truth for Health Foundation is not a medical clinic or hospital. The website appears to be a compilation of antivax tropes. No patients are seen there. No medical research is done there. He also has a personal website where he promotes a scientifically unsupported and highly questionable Covid treatment protocol and sells "supplements" which he promises will rid your body of spike protein remaining from infection or vaccines. (No scientific evidence for this, of course. Proteases in your body destroy spike protein.) There is a link and a number to schedule an appointment, but I cannot tell if he actually does see patients.
And look at this: Baylor Gets Restraining Order Against COVID Vaccine Skeptic Doc, Baylor health sues COVID-19 vaccine skeptic and demands Dallas doctor stop using its name, Lawsuit Against Dr. Peter McCullough by Baylor Scott & White Dismissed.
It looks like Baylor sued McCullough for violating an agreement to not claim any affiliation with Baylor university. He signed this when Baylor cut ties with him around the time he jumped on the antivax/misinformation bandwagon. McCullough has claimed that the dismissal of the lawsuit was a "victory for free speech." However, according to the article about the lawsuit, cases are dismissed when the parties involved reach an out-of-court settlement. As far as I can tell, McCullough is still prohibited from claiming affiliation with Baylor.