And OBTW, those pinprick lights up there they call stars are actually holes in the universe wall where Heaven's glorious light is shining through...
Posted on 10/27/2023 7:30:06 AM PDT by Red Badger
Ping!.................
I’m still looking for my extra car key if anyone sees it.
http//heim-theory.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Illobrand_von_Ludwiger-The_New_Worldview_of_the_Physicist_Burkhard_Heim.pdf
Here is the underlying theory that supports this.
Is that the Death Star in the upper left corner?
That’s no moon......................
The Universe is like a giant set of Russian Nesting Dolls.................
BTTT a Universe ping!
It’s turtles all the way down!
“This plot suggests the universe may have started as an instanton, which has a specific size and mass, rather than a singularity, which is a hypothetical point of infinite density and temperature,” Mr. Patel said.”
They seem to have missed a key point in their reasoning. The reason that the Big Bang starts from a singularity is not because we know singularities to be real things, but because that’s the only conceivable thing that could contain all of the matter and energy that is currently contained in the universe in a single starting point. If they start instead with a particle with definite mass, then they cannot account for where all the rest of the mass we see in the universe today came from.
And OBTW, those pinprick lights up there they call stars are actually holes in the universe wall where Heaven's glorious light is shining through...
I dunno. I’m just an engineer and not an astrophysicist, but I begin to be reminded of a schoolyard game. The rule-makers set the rules, and then when it doesn’t work, they change them...
So if I’m reading that last graph correctly, are these folks saying everything in the universe arose from an “instanton” that had roughly the mass of a flea (or its energy equivalent) compressed in a volume about twenty orders of magnitude smaller than that of a proton?
Does that chart remind anyone else of the Hot/Crazy Mix?
Either way, they ignore the big questions. Where did the instanton or singularly come from and what caused it to suddenly explode into the universe?
It is not unlike the theory of the evolution of life. We know how complex organic molecules are formed and we know how animals evolve but no one can explain how to make the jump from the most complex organic molecules to the simplest living organism.
Another reason to avoid black holes (almost zero hot; still sufficiently crazy to ruin your life)
That or the F-around/Find-out graph.
Cool pic...analysis above my pay grade
I’m a little bit skeptical when someone implies that it might be possible for the human mind to encompass the universe and to fully understand it.
They haven’t given satisfactory answers to the big questions, and the Big Bang Theory is much better as a sitcom than as the explanation for the universe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.