Nature injects foreign genetic material into our bodies all the time and has since the first eukaryotic cells evolved on the planet. Its called a virus. The reason our body produces antibodies is because foreign genetic material is detected and eliminated by the immune system. The mRNA vaccines simply exploit this basic biological process in the same way that flu vaccines, pneumonia vaccines, and shingles vaccines do. They are safer than these because they don’t contain other genetic material that could trigger the actual disease.
This article is, with all do respect, misinformation used to a achieve a political effect and not science. There are issues of safety and efficacy with any novel medical technology, but the premise of this article is contradicted by the life saving history of vaccination since the time of Pasteur.
I take it you like immediately contradicting your premise: mRNA "vaccines" and killed virus vaccines are two very different modalities. McCullough is right to be suspicious of the manufacturers of even the latter, given what we've seen with COVID-19 mRNA therapies.
“Science” has become a cliche, a cheap whore for sale.
It’s a label every snake oil salesmen wants to put on their product today.
As to the topic of vaccines, it has become a political/ideological one where you have two sides rallying around flags and beating their drums no differently than all other topics that enter the realm of philosophy.
You make a cogent argument but I will counter it.
If I ask you if MRI contrast is safe what will you tell me? You are injecting a heavy metal into the body.
Will you tell me it leaves your body through your kidneys in less than a week even in kidney impaired people.
I will counter and say that MRI contrast caused my body to revolt and revolt hard. It is possible that it triggered autoimmune issues.
And as far as leaving your body in a week. Nope. 4 months later Mayo clinic test showed I had high levels passing through my kidneys and I dont have renal failure.
https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Overview/89301
I have a theory as to why it happened. But I can tell you the medical community told me it was safe and couldn’t possibly be causing a problem. Once I got the Mayo Clinic lab test back then I heard BS like maybe the test was wrong.
There is too much that is unknown about the body and you can’t possibly say the VAX is safe for all people
Don’t be late for your next booster!!
You said -
Nature injects foreign genetic material into our bodies all the time and has since the first eukaryotic cells evolved on the planet. Its called a virus. The reason our body produces antibodies is because foreign genetic material is detected and eliminated by the immune system. The mRNA vaccines simply exploit this basic biological process in the same way that flu vaccines, pneumonia vaccines, and shingles vaccines do. They are safer than these because they don’t contain other genetic material that could trigger the actual disease.
This article is, with all do respect, misinformation used to a achieve a political effect and not science. There are issues of safety and efficacy with any novel medical technology, but the premise of this article is contradicted by the life saving history of vaccination since the time of Pasteur.
- end of what you said
What virus contains Pseudouridine?
I understand pseudouridine to be a new material recently discovered and added as a part of the mRNA vaccine to provide stability.
The use of pseudouridine in the “vax” is why tests can determine if the circulating spike proteins found in tissue outside of the injection site is from the “vax” or if it is from regular COVID-19 infection.
With all due respect, the “vax” for COVID-19 is not what you understand it to be. The word vaccine has been redefined since the time of Pasteur and is now a marketing gimmick.
Good luck.
And thank you for your comment!
I read it again, and you made me laugh a little bit with “They are safer than these because they don’t contain other genetic material that could trigger the actual disease.” Yeah. OK. These are some of the dirtiest pharmaceuticals produced. Why do quality assurance when you have complete liability protection?
“but the premise of this article is contradicted by the life saving history of vaccination since the time of Pasteur.”
The drug companies had to change the definition of was a vaccine is, in order for the mRNA gene treatment could be classified as a “vaccine”. It could not have been licensed if they had not done so.
None of what you accused Dr. McCullough of is true.
I’m not here to preach to anyone about this, but there is already enough evidence to conclude this is the biggest medical disaster in the history of mankind.
The experiment must end.