(Interesting group. Fooled me and pretty much anyone else thinking it was Depeche Mode)
Back to the actual topic, most of us FReepers have been trying to explain this to the Vaxx-holes..
Posted on 10/11/2023 8:36:38 PM PDT by RandFan
It is a hot mess of contamination, “unexpected” ramifications, immune system damage, physical reactions, intended harm, criminal grifting, bad science, and political malfeasance.
Yep.
“Deny - Deny - Deny.
Gee. Who does that?
Yes, the same infamous people who ignore “Cause and Effect”?
THOSE of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of CoV-SARS-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory, have had to endure unbelievable scorn, scientific ostracism
The SARS-CoV2 virus contains NO unnatural inserts. The sequence of SARS-CoV2 is in the public domain and anyone can check it. I checked it personally. Unnatural sequences simply are not there.
As for SARS-CoV2 sequences being similar to other sequences published by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it would be surprising if they were NOT similar. After all, the Wuhan Institute has been studying bat coronaviruses for years because scientists have long recognized the potential for a coronavirus to develop pandemic potential. They publish the sequences. Bat coronaviruses have similar sequences. Actually, all coronaviruses have similar sequences.
First the ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promised but travelled throughout the body and were found at post-mortems to be everywhere.
It would have been REALLY nice to see a scientific reference to support this claim. I'm pretty good at finding references, even when antivaxxers purposely try to hide the actual papers they used. Professional antivaxxers do not like to give details of the papers they are misusing, even when they use real scientific papers. Sometimes, they just invent references. But I could find nothing that could be cherry-picked and misinterpreted to come up with such a claim. I used the search term "mrna vaccine systemic distribution" in the www.pubmed.gov medical/scientific literature database. Nope, didn't find it.
Last June, whistleblowers led by the scientists Sucharit Bhakdi and Kevin McKernan raised an entirely new issue of concern – that of serious levels of DNA contamination.
This is speculation based on a paper that McKernan wrote and posted on some "pre-publication" website. The fact that he could not get it published in a legitimate scientific journal says a lot. For a detailed debunking of this claim, I refer to this article: Claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain DNA contaminants based on study of vials of “unknown provenance”; no evidence COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can alter DNA in people.
It reports that McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials, a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promoters are also well recognised as being oncogenic or cancer-inducing
This is also debunked in the article I linked. SV40 promoters are NOT oncogenic. A promoter is a gene element that signals to the RNA transcription enzymes to attach to the DNA and transcribe the gene following the promoter. Transcription is the biological process of "reading" DNA to make RNA. In mRNA vaccine production, the SV40 promoter actually causes transcription of an antibiotic resistance gene. The promoter used to make spike mRNA is a T7 promoter, which only works in bacteria. None of the DNA plasmids used to make the spike mRNA contain any oncogenes.
Interestingly, that debunking article points out that SARS-CoV2 genes do integrate into the genome of infected cells. But the vaccine spike mRNA can't do that.
Oh, I should point out that the integration of a virus genome into human DNA can potentially cause cancer. If that virus genome inserts itself into the promoter sequence of genes involved in regulating cell growth, it can cause them to become unregulated and grow uncontrollably.
Well, I think this is all I have the energy to debunk right now. This blog was written by piling on so many lies that it becomes extremely time-intensive to rebut every single one. And that highlights a challenge for the scientific community: we can only discern the truth through long and tedious research, but fear-mongerers can swamp our truths under massive volumes of lies in moments.
A typical gene:
Promoter--start of gene--middle of gene--end of gene--signal to stop transcription.
The RNA transcription enzymes attach on the promoter and fall off at the stop sequence.
It was totally unfair of libh8er to post a piece exposing the “turbo cancer” claim for ridiculous farce that it is. How can we ever scare people if such debunking is allowed??
But if the article from this Brit conspiracy website had been posted over in the Q Safe Space then mean mockers wouldn’t be able to post mean comments. Something to think about, moggy guy.
Poor little kids without their mom.
My strong, handsome son-in-law died recently of very aggressive liver, then kidney cancer. He was 55. He got Novavax, I believe that was the one-shot vax.
Get stuffed, $hot $hill.
So sorry to hear about your son in law. My condolences.
I’m sorry
Like Islam, climate change and transgenderism, anti vaxxism is a CULT. You will sooner change the minds of Gaza militants on Israel than the anti vax hysterics on the vaccine.
absolutely!
Recent report of COVID vaccine mRNA in human breast milk.
Also a few articles about the types of lnp used to deliver mRNA to different cell types. It appears to be well known that mRNA can be delivered to different body tissues. In fact, research is done in order to get the mRNA to the cells which would be needed to be affected by the therapeutic activity of mRNA translation.
This kind of stuff is beyond the scope of most medical literature as it is a nascent technology not in wide public use and it would be difficult to research it as the paradigm of “if you hear hoofbeats you don’t look for zebras” reigns.
IMHO....In a few more years it will be obvious that the phenomena of other tissue distribution was overlooked in the use of COVID mRNa injection as the risk/benefit ratio at the time favored use of the unproven widespread safety of the vaccine vs. COVID 19 infection.IMHO
Freegards
P.S....try duckduckgo...instead of Google for your searches... that’s where I found the articles reporting what I wrote here...technical journals...not opinion blogs...
bkmk
Safe AND effective
thx for the post: two comments:
really like ‘Spectator Australia’ for hard news, especially down there.
and i think the esteemed author’s sentence containing ‘... the SARS viruses are subject to immunological imprinting: that is, once they have seen a vaccine...’
sounds like he’s saying the virus is seeing the vaccine, which i think is incorrect. i think the use of ‘they’ is a bit awkward or confused. it shouldn’t be a pronoun read as viruses, it should refer to the immune system’s response to the virus or jab. ‘...that is, once the immune system has seen a vaccine...’ that comports better with my understanding of imprinting, antigenic sin, and ADE or anti-bodies that actually help or husband the infection, whether from a subsequent rogue jab or from another SARS variant (including the bio-weapon spiked varieties). hope that makes some sense.
“ Sod off”
You take your Britspeak and shove it where the sun don’t shine.
Come on. Who ya gonna believe? This little known scientist or Travis Kelce? Travis is a famous football player and Taylor Swift’s boyfriend you know. Isn’t that good enough for you?
A friend was diagnosed with a brain tumor a few months ago. He was proudly vaxed and now he’s dead.
Another friend has the same type of tumor. He’s alive and has a good prognosis.
Turbo cancer is real. The vax is the only common denominator
Since we call everything else a “she” (like boats, ships, cars, houses, etc..), then we should call them “she” too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.