The Moon Landing: Stanley Kubrick's Greatest Film: How NASA and Hollywood Fooled the World (Video)

The Why Files ^ | 07/20/2023 | Why Files

[Magnum44]

At each landing site, the astronauts placed retro reflectors. To this day, these retro reflectors are used to bounce laser beams off the moon by astronomers all over the world. The ranging measurements are used to solve for the lunar motion about the Earth.

In addition, Photos of each of the six Apollo landing sites photographed from low orbit by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter are available. ALSEP stands for Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package. The astronauts' tracks as well as the rover and other items are plainly visible.

Good grief, this stuff is not that hard to google. Some 'investigators' you deniers are.

[Responsibility2nd]

Van Allen has written extensively on his belts. Read him!

_____________________________________________

Post of the day. It shows you have a cunning ability of wit and humour.

I knew you were spoofing us with this crazy mess. This post proves it.

[NorthMountain]

Hmmmm ...

Well ... there’s 7 years spent studying physics at the university and graduate level, 4 years studying electrical engineering at the graduate level.

That’s enough.

[Mr. K]

Ahh... So you heard something about the ‘Van Allen belts’ being deadly and you latched onto that, rather than believe the fact that astronauts actually went through them and lived.

[Jan_Sobieski]

The Ban Allen Belts are bad. But outside the Van Allen Belts can be even worse with no protection from Solar Irradiance!

[Jan_Sobieski]

The belts trap highly charged particles and spending lots of time in them can cause radiation effects, but passing through them to get to the moon or mars or anywhere else is not fatal, and can be mitigated by shielding.

We did not have the shielding technology needed to pass safely through the Van Allen Belts in 1969. Heck, we didn’t even know the extent of the belts. Later probes even found additional belts! NASA said our pilots navigated using stars.?.? Well, they would have had to since navigation computers were not powerful enough. Do you believe they navigated 238,000 miles using the stars they said they couldn’t see? Additionally Solar irradiance outside the belts is deadly. What protected our young men from this?

[Jan_Sobieski]

I had experiments fly on space shuttle missions where theoretical effects of the belts on charged particles from an ion emitter were verified by experiment.

Why do you think your experiments were always below 1000 miles?

[Jan_Sobieski]

The ignorant comments by some here on this forum are sad. That is all I can say about such ignorant posters, when compared to the giants and heroes who make this country great. Feel free to crawl back under your rock.

Since NASA and the US Government spoliated all the evidence surrounding the Moon Landings (rocket designs, Capsule designs, actual video footage, etc.), we can only use the standard of a court of law: Circumstantial and Factual evidence! That evidence suggests a clever ruse implemented at the highest levels.

[Magnum44]

There are so many ignorant statements in your post its hard to know where to start. 1) The radiation belts dont subject you to lethal dosage instantly. It takes days of exposure. The flights to the moon transit in a few hours. 2) Anything between you and the radiation source is a shield as it absorbs the charged particles first. The space ship was a shield. 3) Solar irradiance outside the belts lethal? Only if there is a storm, which the space weather experts watch out for, and can provide warning to have astronauts move to shielded areas or orient the ship for best shielding. 4) Optical nav is as old as the kings navy, and yes the astronauts used sextants as part of the nav solutions going and coming from the moon. We use the same principles today to fly missions to the other planets. The only difference is there are cameras that we can measure angles from planetary limb and stars with instead of people and sextants.

[absalom01]

I think some of them are deliberately, willfully, knowingly lying with malice aforethought.

Now that's a conspiracy theory I can get behind! There's no way this level of kookery is on the level, is there?
Self-assembling sea monkeys in vaccines, now fake moon landings, ya gotta wonder what's next.

On the one hand, it's entertaining, and if Jan wants to offer himself as an object of ridicule and mirth, who am I to stop him? I certainly look forward to the next installment in any case.

[Magnum44]

Shuttle was designed to go to LEO

[Magnum44]

You can look at my post 241. Circumstantial and Factual evidence!

And its not an insult when its true.

[musicman]

BTTT!!!

[Magnum44]

Hey, I saw this on the internet. It must be true!

[NorthMountain]

Since NASA and the US Government spoliated all the evidence surrounding the Moon Landings (rocket designs, Capsule designs, actual video footage, etc.)

Lying to the court completely negates your testimony, Jan.

[Jan_Sobieski]

You are not offending me. I’ve consulted with NASA. It’s an affirmative action Climate Change company. I work for one of the largest Aerospace Companies in the world. Show me the designs they used to get to the moon and back. Also, let me see the FMC, FCS they used. My teams do extensive work on these!

[Magnum44]

I’ve consulted with NASA... I work for one of the largest Aerospace Companies in the world. Show me the designs they used to get to the moon and back... let me see the FMC, FCS they used... My teams do extensive work on these!

Your 'unhinged' is showing.

[Jan_Sobieski]

Lying to the court completely negates your testimony, Jan.

Perhaps I’m wrong and NASA didn’t spoliate all the rocket design plans, capsule design plans, FMS/FMC designs, mechanical drawings, schematics, wiring diagrams, video footage, etc. Can you get them for me? I would like to analyze them!

[rx]

Mythbusters' "debunking" is just another layer of lies onto the original mistakes from paid (biased) "fact checkers." Their apparent motto: "Always have something to say so you and your mindless drones can say it's "[a]ll [been] debunked."

Please consider that there are not just one, two or a half dozen things wrong with the Apollo claims, there are several dozen. If there were that many things wrong with Trump's Georgia phone call, Trump would rightly have been in jail years ago--because he's an outsider. If there were that many things wrong with the Deep State' and Biden's claims, the government's would be tripping over themselves a pratfall after pratfall, even while Democrats remain fully convinced that Biden got 81 million votes. You ignore the evidence about the Apollo missions' fakery just like the Ds stick to the DS narratives. "Trump's mean tweets show his guilt, of course." /s

Please refer yourself to: https://www.aulis.com/investigation.htm and my several previous posts on the topic. To expect to be heard, you have a burden to address yourself to the developed and cited, copious evidence therein, not simply jerk that frog knee with "All debunked."

Double crosshair reticules in pictures said to have been unedited.

homeless shelter-level technology of which no NASA construction engineer could be proud.

In late '61, when the Saturn V boosters were already in testing, Wernher von Braun was recorded in multiple documentaries saying that to reach the moon, another more powerful level of rocket technology would have to be designed and implemented. That next level booster was planned, started and scrapped after delays and cost overruns. All the Apollo missions curiously used the Saturn V. As chief of Rocket technology, Wernher's testimony represents the best NASA could have done. There is no evidence of any claimed technological breakthrough or shortcut to negate WvB's '61 testimony.

Please address the evidence.

[NorthMountain]

I continue to be astonished by what you can find on the internet