Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: frogjerk; cgbg
Mythbusters' "debunking" is just another layer of lies onto the original mistakes from paid (biased) "fact checkers." Their apparent motto: "Always have something to say so you and your mindless drones can say it's "[a]ll [been] debunked."

Please consider that there are not just one, two or a half dozen things wrong with the Apollo claims, there are several dozen. If there were that many things wrong with Trump's Georgia phone call, Trump would rightly have been in jail years ago--because he's an outsider. If there were that many things wrong with the Deep State' and Biden's claims, the government's would be tripping over themselves a pratfall after pratfall, even while Democrats remain fully convinced that Biden got 81 million votes. You ignore the evidence about the Apollo missions' fakery just like the Ds stick to the DS narratives. "Trump's mean tweets show his guilt, of course." /s

Please refer yourself to: https://www.aulis.com/investigation.htm and my several previous posts on the topic. To expect to be heard, you have a burden to address yourself to the developed and cited, copious evidence therein, not simply jerk that frog knee with "All debunked."


Double crosshair reticules in pictures said to have been unedited.


homeless shelter-level technology of which no NASA construction engineer could be proud.

In late '61, when the Saturn V boosters were already in testing, Wernher von Braun was recorded in multiple documentaries saying that to reach the moon, another more powerful level of rocket technology would have to be designed and implemented. That next level booster was planned, started and scrapped after delays and cost overruns. All the Apollo missions curiously used the Saturn V. As chief of Rocket technology, Wernher's testimony represents the best NASA could have done. There is no evidence of any claimed technological breakthrough or shortcut to negate WvB's '61 testimony.

Please address the evidence.

259 posted on 08/25/2023 9:43:15 AM PDT by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: rx; Magnum44
There is no evidence of any claimed technological breakthrough or shortcut to negate WvB's '61 testimony.

Werner von Braun wanted to send a single spacecraft to the Moon, land there, take off again, and return to Earth. That plan suffers from the same problem as "single stage to orbit" (which you should learn about): it means carrying a lot of dead weight. His plan was rejected for that reason.

Orbital launches even today, and the Moon flights in particular, used repeated staging and jettisoning of empty fuel storage, in order to minimize the power needed to "get there".

The solution to von Braun's conundrum wasn't a "technological breakthrough", it was just better planning. A big part of Project Gemini, incidentally, was learning how to dock space in orbit. This would be necessary for the later Moon landings. You would do well to learn about the actual purposes of Project Mercury and Project Gemini.

Oh, and "aulis dot com" carries negative credibility.

264 posted on 08/25/2023 10:23:30 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson