Posted on 07/31/2023 7:51:38 PM PDT by Lakeside Granny
Pickens, GA Rally~~July 1st
Council Bluffs, Iowa Rally~~July 7th
Nevada Volunteer Recruitment Event LV, NV~~July 8th
Turning Point USA Action Conference West Palm Beach, FL~~July 15-16
Iowa GOP Lincoln Dinner Des Moines, IA ~~July 26th
Erie, PA Rally~~July 27th
And his family!
Thanks Rusty!
I doubled my sales today!
Woo Wee and made sure All saw in Management that I ranked #1 in all our 11 stores in district for Arden! :)
Hey got to show em or they’ll whine next week,I’m not doing enough! HA!
Quit eating as soon as you feel slightly full. Don’t count calories. But it does help to eat vegetables or salad first as that fills you up.
it is.
maybe ignorance IS bliss.
That is just so sweet. I have great relationships with family and friends, but honesty, some of my best relationships have been with animals,. I know that sounds crazy, but isn’t that why God created animals?
Yes!
I just read your post 943 , the Bee article...perfect....LOL
Yes, it was Melania Wannabe herself - she opened the envelope.
Yes, he did.
Who wins the Drama Queen award, Swal-not-so-well or AOC who just knew she was going to be raped and killed.
Makes me wonder just how in on the Piglousy plot he was.
This is the Truth I love!
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
14h
I NEED ONE MORE INDICTMENT TO ENSURE MY ELECTION!
That was awesome! Thanks for posting.
That Scottish reporter was showing his liberal bias.
But the MAGA American told it like it is!
You’re welcome.
Matt is a MAGA fighter and for Trump all the way.
Sorry I missed you earlier.
I got some very distressing news and needed to calm down so went to read pretty early last night.
Amen!
CBS News’ Catherine Herridge: Attorney Points to Big Problem With Trump Indictment—Allegedly Exculpatory Evidence
Red State ^ | 08/03/2023 | Nick Arama
Posted on 8/3/2023, 8:53:17 PM by SeekAndFind
Looks like there are more problems with that indictment from Special Counsel Jack Smith, even as it just getting started with the arraignment of former President Donald Trump on Thursday.
Trump entered a not guilty plea to the four counts, which included conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.
According to a report from CBS News’ Catherine Herridge, Tim Parlatore, who is the attorney for former NYPD Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik, provided records to Jack Smith on July 23. Parlatore thinks the Special Counsel may not have reviewed records before indicting Trump because he thinks those materials are exculpatory.
A source close to Kerik’s legal team said at the time that they believed the records, which include sworn affidavits from people raising concerns about the integrity of the 2020 presidential contest, show there was a genuine effort to investigate claims of voter fraud in the last election.
In an Aug. 2 email to Parlatore, reviewed by CBS News, a special counsel’s office prosecutor requested “responsive documents as to which the Trump campaign is no longer asserting a privilege,” referring to the Kerik records Parlatore said he previously provided.
Parlatore said he was “stunned” when, after the indictment came down, the prosecutor contacted him asking for the records he said he had already provided. Parlatore said the “records are absolutely exculpatory.”
“They bear directly on the essential element of whether Rudy Giuliani, and therefore Donald Trump, knew that their claims of election fraud were false,” Parlatore said. “Good- faith reliance upon claims of fraud, even if they later turn out to be false, is very different from pushing fraud claims that you know to be false at the time.”
Parlatore used to work for Trump but left in May.
But if, indeed, those materials are exculpatory and Smith proceeded anyway, that doesn’t say a lot about his case or his process. If Trump is pursuing all these efforts to prove fraud, it does tend to show he has an honestly held belief. That puts a big hole in an indictment that was already flawed, and seemingly based on going after him for his beliefs. We’ve already seen legal experts like George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley and former prosecutor Andy McCarthy casting doubt on the flawed nature of this latest indictment. Not to mention how Republicans aren’t allowed to doubt election results. For them, now, it’s seemingly a crime. Yet Democrats can take all kinds of actions to question elections, and they will not be pursued with criminal action like this.
Some now believe after all the flurry of lawfare, that this isn’t so much about obtaining a conviction against Donald Trump as much as it is about taking up Trump’s time and money to defend the endless actions. That way you incapacitate him as a candidate even if you can’t convict him on the evidence, and Democrats get what they want — they hold onto power.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4172709/posts
Prayers , Gran.
Good morning, lysie!
That sure does look good! Thanks.
Maybe I’ll have a few nibbles now, go get a few more winks, then finish it off when I get up, sounds like a plan to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
