To: SunkenCiv
Are you illiterate? The article feigns surprise over this “discovery.” AS IF THE LOCATION WAS NOT KNOWN. It’s been only 85 years. Locations from 2000+ years ago are well known. But not this location from 85 years ago?
17 posted on
07/09/2023 11:44:36 AM PDT by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
To: Moltke
I read it more as, they probably figured that the Synagogue was reduced to rubble, and they would never find any remnants of it.
18 posted on
07/09/2023 11:45:50 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Moltke
It’s not the location, it’s the rubble (e.g., a frieze of the 10 commandments), which was moved twice apparently.
20 posted on
07/09/2023 11:51:03 AM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: Moltke
Hey numbnuts, read beyond the title.
21 posted on
07/09/2023 12:25:09 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson